On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org> wrote:

On 9 May 2012 12:40, Deepti Kalakeri <deepti.kalakeri@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Its been close to a month now that the kernel CI hwpacks built on
> ci.linaro.org with default omap2plus defconfigs
> (available in the linux-arm-soc, linux-next, linux-linaro, linux) are
> failing to boot on the boards.

Thanks for the update Deepti.

>
> Here is an example hwpack built using the linux-linaro tree with omap2plus
> defconfig on ci.linaro.org which is failing to boot, in case you want to try
> to test it.
>
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/kernel-h
> wpack/linux-linaro-tracking/linux-linaro-tracking_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20120509-0641_b64_armel_supported.tar.gz

Is it possible to just get a boot log? I've tried looking through
ci.linaro.org and not quite sure where I can just pull that out.

Here is the boot log for the boot test run by LAVA, this is not for the above hwpack, but is a similar error which is produced by
http://snapshots.linaro.org/kernel-hwpack/linux-linaro-tracking/linux-linaro-tracking_panda-omap2plus/hwpack_linaro-lt-panda_20120508-0637_b63_armel_supported.tar.gz.
You need to click on Inline Viewer tab to see the console messages
http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/dashboard/streams/public/personal/ciadmin/ci-linux-linaro-tracking/bundles/a2eb08c544838bc5c44d35c831aa46ba3a70a9a2/7f1538aa-9844-11e1-9729-68b599be548c/attachments/71973/

> I was able to fix the above boot problem of the CI kernel hwpacks built
> with omap2plus defconfig
> by adding the options similar to the ones available in (linux-linaro tree)
> default omap4 defconfig on top of the default
> omap2plus defconfig options.
>
> Here is the list of the config options which I added
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/977642/ along with the omap2plus
> defconfig to make it work.
>
> Can someone help me with the basic omap2plus defconfig options that will be
> required to boot the hwpack on the board.
> Does anyone care of kernel builds for linux-arm-soc, linux-next,
> linux-linaro, linux tree using omap2plus defconfigs ?

The answer is that someone should care, ideally Tony L. the OMAP
maintainer and I will ping him to start looking at results.

That would be great, I have created a bug 972191 for tracking this problem, in case you want to update the bug.

>
> Apart from this, there are build failures with the linux-next trees failing
> since last 20 days.
> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/Linux%20%28next%29/ lists such failing
> build jobs.
> For example the following job fails
> https://ci.linaro.org/jenkins/view/Linux%20%28next%29/job/linux-next_panda-omap2plus/.
> Can someone look at these linux-next build failures ?

I grabbed today's -next and reproduced the issue, which turns out to
be related to 'make deb-pkg'. I'll dig into it.

~Deepak