Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: try to resume policies which failed on last resume

On 26 December 2013 06:35, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@rjwysocki.net wrote:

From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Subject: cpufreq: Clean up after a failing light-weight initialization

If cpufreq_policy_restore() returns NULL during system resume, __cpufreq_add_dev() should just fall back to the full initialization instead of returning an error, because that may actually make things work. Moreover, it should not leave stale fallback data behind after it has failed to restore a previously existing policy.

This change is based on Viresh Kumar's work.

Reported-by: Bjørn Mork bjorn@mork.no Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com

---

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org