On 19 January 2015 at 17:03, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:59:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Can we at least get the DT information required to load the driver
> (ideally in mainline so we can backport it and we get any upstream testing
> going)? It's obviously not terribly meaningful as testing goes but it's
> low effort and better than nothing.

The other snag there is that there is discussion upstream about changing
the binding entirely (to use the generic IOMMU bindings from Thierry).
This has been deemed OK as there are no users of the current binding, so
if Juno is going to become the first user then we'd need to discuss
upstream.

I'd prefer to have at least some of that discussion before backporting - if people start using LSK DTs we may end up having to support the current binding in mainline anyway so it'd seem better to backport with the generic binding if we can.