The commit 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv obj v7") ported all the DRM drivers to use the newer fence API that specifies the usage with the enum dma_resv_usage rather than doing an explicit shared / exclusive distinction.

But the commit didn't do it properly in two callers of the vc4 driver, leading to build errors.

Fixes: 73511edf8b19 ("dma-buf: specify usage while adding fences to dma_resv obj v7") Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javierm@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com ---

drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c index 38550317e025..9eaf304fc20d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_gem.c @@ -546,7 +546,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno) bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->bo[i]->base); bo->seqno = seqno;

- dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence); + dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence, + DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ); }

list_for_each_entry(bo, &exec->unref_list, unref_head) { @@ -557,7 +558,8 @@ vc4_update_bo_seqnos(struct vc4_exec_info *exec, uint64_t seqno) bo = to_vc4_bo(&exec->rcl_write_bo[i]->base); bo->write_seqno = seqno;

- dma_resv_add_excl_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence); + dma_resv_add_fence(bo->base.base.resv, exec->fence, + DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE); } }