On 11 November 2014 19:09, Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra@linaro.org> wrote:
Let's start with the good news: yes, someone is looking at that. The bad news: The patches are a joke and the submitter doesn't seem to understand the objections raised.

Koen is referring to http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/82875/

Obviously, we're actively working on keeping metal-linaro layer a small delta as possible.
We're regularly sending patches *and* test them on our autobuilders for the architectures that we care about.

I've not seen any feedback on the latest series beyond patch squashing.  I'm aware that there are now two libpng patches (and to be honest, Koen's form is neater), but what are the other issues?  I've not given Kai's series a comprehensive review yet beyond seeing that it builds.

Bundling poky instead of plain OE-core makes me strongly suspect meta-luv being broken to start with.

luv uses poky because the genericx86* BSPs in meta-yocto-bsp actually target more machines in the wild than the meta-intel BSPs, which are focused at specific chipsets.

Ross