On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:18:01AM +0000, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
Hi Ard, Leif,
Any comments on this patch ?
You didn't cc me before :)
But more importantly, I don't really have any platform to test this on, so I could use a Tested-by: from someone who does. Evan, do you?
From: Bhupesh Sharma [mailto:bhupesh.sharma@nxp.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 4:40 PM
ARM TZASC-380 IP provides a mechanism to split memory regions being protected via it into eight equal-sized sub-regions, with a bit setting allowing the corresponding subregion to be disabled.
Several NXP/FSL SoCs support the TZASC-380 IP block and allow the DDR connected via the TZASC to be partitioned into regions having different security settings.
This patch enables this support and can be used for SoCs which support such partition of DDR regions.
Details of the 'subregion_disable'
This is not actually what the register is called in the link you're providing.
register can be viewed here: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0431c/CJ ABCFHB.html
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma bhupesh.sharma@nxp.com Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
.../Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9x4Sec.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/ArmTrustZone/ArmTrustZone.c | 5 +++-- ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Drivers/ArmTrustzone.h | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9x4S ec.c b/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9x4S ec.c index 6fa0774..d358d65 100644
a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9x4S ec.c +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9 +++ x4Sec.c @@ -72,18 +72,21 @@ ArmPlatformSecTrustzoneInit ( // NOR Flash 0 non secure (BootMon) TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,1,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_NOR0_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,0);// NOR Flash 1. The first half of the NOR Flash1 must be secure for
the secure firmware (sec_uefi.bin) if (PcdGetBool (PcdTrustzoneSupport) == TRUE) { //Note: Your OS Kernel must be aware of the secure regions before to enable this region TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,2,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_NOR1_BASE + SIZE_32MB,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_32MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_32MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,- 0);
TAB used (convert to spaces).
} else { TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,2,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_NOR1_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,- 0);
TAB used (convert to spaces).
}
// Base of SRAM. Only half of SRAM in Non Secure world @@ -92,22 +95,26 @@ ArmPlatformSecTrustzoneInit ( //Note: Your OS Kernel must be aware of the secure regions before to enable this region TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,3,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_SRAM_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_16MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_16MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,- 0);
TAB used (convert to spaces).
} else { TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,3,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_SRAM_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_32MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_32MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,- 0);
TAB used (convert to spaces).
(These are all found by BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py, which also points out that the subject line is too long.)
}
// Memory Mapped Peripherals. All in non secure world TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,4,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_PERIPH_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_64MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,0);// MotherBoard Peripherals and On-chip peripherals. TZASCSetRegion(ARM_VE_TZASC_BASE,5,TZASC_REGION_ENABLED, ARM_VE_SMB_MB_ON_CHIP_PERIPH_BASE,0,
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_256MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW);
TZASC_REGION_SIZE_256MB, TZASC_REGION_SECURITY_NSRW,0);}
/** diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/ArmTrustZone/ArmTrustZone.c b/ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/ArmTrustZone/ArmTrustZone.c index 070c0dc..5cd41ef 100644 --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/ArmTrustZone/ArmTrustZone.c +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/Drivers/ArmTrustZone/ArmTrustZone.c @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ TZASCSetRegion ( IN UINTN LowAddress, IN UINTN HighAddress, IN UINTN Size,
- IN UINTN Security
- IN UINTN Security,
- IN UINTN SubregionDisableMask )
{ UINT32* Region; @@ -100,7 +101,7 @@ TZASCSetRegion (
MmioWrite32((UINTN)(Region), LowAddress&0xFFFF8000); MmioWrite32((UINTN)(Region+1), HighAddress);
- MmioWrite32((UINTN)(Region+2), ((Security & 0xF) <<28) | ((Size &
0x3F) << 1) | (Enabled & 0x1));
- MmioWrite32((UINTN)(Region+2), ((Security & 0xF) <<28) |
- ((SubregionDisableMask & 0xFF) << 8) | ((Size & 0x3F) << 1) |
(Enabled
- & 0x1));
I think these additions tip the code over to where a temporary variable should be used for the register value.
return EFI_SUCCESS; } diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Drivers/ArmTrustzone.h b/ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Drivers/ArmTrustzone.h index 78e98aa..1ba963d 100644 --- a/ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Drivers/ArmTrustzone.h +++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Drivers/ArmTrustzone.h @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ TZASCSetRegion ( IN UINTN LowAddress, IN UINTN HighAddress, IN UINTN Size,
- IN UINTN Security
- IN UINTN Security,
- IN UINTN SubregionDisableMask );
This modifies a prototype of a function implemented in: ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibCTA9x4/CTA9x4Sec.c ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/Library/ArmVExpressSecLibRTSM/RTSMSec.c ArmPlatformPkg/Library/ArmPlatformSecLibNull/ArmPlatformLibNullSec.c
But only modifies the implementation in one of them. Arguably, the RTSM one could simply be deleted (probably), but if we're keeping this library, then the LibNullSec should at least be kept up to date.
Ard: comments on deleting the RTSM one?
Regards,
Leif
#endif
1.9.1
Regards, Bhupesh _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel