On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 18:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:Updating the library would certainly be preferable if Roy is willing.
> On 07/22/2014 06:12 PM, Roy Franz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> On 07/22/2014 01:43 AM, Roy Franz wrote:
> >>> Add fdt_create_empty_tree() function from v1.4.0 of libfdt taken from
> >>> git://git.jdl.com/software/dtc.git
> >>> This function was not present in v1.3.0, but is a relatively simple
> >>> helper function, and appears to work fine with the v1.3.0 that is
> >>> currently present in XEN.
> >>
> >> Shouldn't we update our internal libfdt to v1.4.0 rather than taking
> >> only the new file?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >
> > I can certainly do that - I was simply being conservative.
>
> It's better to update the whole library to keep track of change. Ian,
> Stefano, any thoughts?
Yeah, that's fine.
> > Should I prepare an patch independent of the EFI stub series to
> > just update the libfdt, or would you like it kept as part of the current
> > series?
>
> I'm fine if you let the libfdt change in this series.
Ian.