I don't like to put this to the personal directory on people.linaro.org.In the future, the person who want to change this file is probably not us,
but the member of android team or graphics team or others.so it's better that they also have the permission to modify that file, like change or delete.
And there should not limited to the test data file, some test tools may also be put there.
Like for android test, I guess it's better to put the compressed monkeyrunner scripts there.
And maybe we can put some binary test tools there, so that we can use them but have no source.
Thanks,
Yongqin Liu
On 10 April 2012 05:56, Paul Larson
<paul.larson@linaro.org> wrote:
Yes, this should have always been in samplemedia, not the wiki. I remember commenting on that in the original mp for a thing a while back... tjbench iirc.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki
<zygmunt.krynicki@linaro.org> wrote:
W dniu 06.04.2012 17:01, Andy Doan pisze:
> I noticed today while looking at a merge proposal that we store some
> test data files for LAVA on the wiki[1]. I'm sure that was chosen
> because it works and its easy to manage. However, I'm not a huge fan of
> this for a few reasons:
>
> * easy to delete an attachment
> * Moin provides no revision control over attachments
> * I took this job to get out of the wiki business :)
* Keep the data with the test in the test's revision control.
Why anyone uses wiki for this is beyond me.
Thanks
ZK
PS: yes, lava needs to be able to support that case sensibly. It would
be nice, from a test author's point of view to say: lava, please make
that directory available in the local network and allow me to refer to
it later as LAVA_TEST_DATA_URL so that my simple wget-test can work
reliably.
--
Zygmunt Krynicki
Linaro Validation Team
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation