last time I have ask the cable was on panda 03 :-)
Anyway e2eaudiotest itself isn't mature enough, I believe that we still have issue on audio paths settings, but Kurt will work on that (Tom can you confirm ?)
I have submit lava e2e test to check if the parser was working well even on error cases.
About cmatest: I have try to test the latest version (v21) but it failed http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/11852 with this strange error "ERROR: There is no test with the specified ID".I don't understand where is the problem, I have run the test on my side without any issues. How the test ID could be wrong ? The same test ID has been used to install the test itself .... strange.
The good news is that realvideo test is working well: http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/1;a=blob_plain;f=cma.json;hb= HEAD1619
I have lot of meetings this morning, and I leave at 12:30....What I wanted to talk with you and Tom, is the numbers of automatic tests done daily on lava. They take so much time than I'm not able to run/validate my own tests before 3-4 pm.Do you think you can reduce the number of daily tests ? for example is it really needed to do android and ubuntu lab health test daily on each board ?Maybe we can also reduce lava test time setup by having rootfs with pre-installed lava-tool package.Have dedicated lava rootfs could also help me the speed up test creation because it is always difficult to found the correct match between hwpack and rootfs.
Regards,Benjamin--2012/2/10 Paul Larson <paul.larson@linaro.org>
Let's talk on Friday, sorry I missed today. I didn't forget you though, just got pulled into an unexpected meeting late in the day after my tsc talk. It never fails that at connects I never manage to talk to everyone I want to, but I wanted to definitely sync with the two of you and see how things were going with cmatest and e2eaudio.
One quick point - on the e2e audio tests, I noticed that you seem to have got a failed result (but a result none-the-less) on panda03. I *think* the only board we've managed to connect with the loopback audio cable is panda01. Dave can confirm that. The company we ordered the audio cables from delayed and we didn't get them before the connect. :(
In the meantime, if you set the target for the job to look at panda01, you should be able to get to a board with the loopback actually plugged in.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
Benjamin Gaignard
Multimedia Working Group
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs