Hi Ricardo, I had a couple of questions about the enablement tests.<br>1. I was looking at <a href="http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/12514">http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/scheduler/job/12514</a> and it seems a lot of times they fail the whole test step.  We are trying to change things such that it only really fails the step if the test completely fails to run, but if individual tests fail, it should not cause the whole test run to exit with failed status.  Does that seem sensible to you? Do you see any reason not to do it that way?  LTP is giving us problems here too, but in the case of linaro tests, we should probably try to pick something and be consistent.<br>

<br>2. I noticed a lot of the graphics tests are failing, and looking at the logs, I see that it couldn&#39;t find the display:<br>root@linaro:~#  [rc=0]: su - linaro -c &#39;DISPLAY=:0 xhost local:&#39;<br>su - linaro -c &#39;DISPLAY=:0 xhost local:&#39;<br>

xhost:  unable to open display &quot;:0&quot;<br><br>I see that the graphics basic enablement test is running before this, so I think it&#39;s maybe leaving the system in an inconsistent state here.  We *could* reorder things, but what might be nicer is if we could do some cleanup after this test.  Would it be sufficient to just do a cleanup at the end with something like:<br>

service lightdm stop<br>kill_xorg<br>set_lightdm_session default (we&#39;d need to save this at some point I guess)<br>service lightdm start<br><br><br>Let me know what you think.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Paul Larson<br><br> at the end<br>