Hi folks.
I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to "lava".
This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and public logs, much like we have on #linaro today. So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the participants to move to #linaro-lava
Thanks Zygmunt Krynicki
+1 - Very good idea. Can have a more focussed set of discussions this way.
Dave
On 7 May 2012, at 20:21, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
Hi folks.
I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to "lava".
This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and public logs, much like we have on #linaro today. So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the participants to move to #linaro-lava
Thanks Zygmunt Krynicki
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
+1, we can have our own channel like ML.
On 8 May 2012 15:08, Dave Pigott dave.pigott@linaro.org wrote:
+1 - Very good idea. Can have a more focussed set of discussions this way.
Dave
On 7 May 2012, at 20:21, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
Hi folks.
I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to "lava".
This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and public logs, much like we have on #linaro today. So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the participants to move to #linaro-lava
Thanks Zygmunt Krynicki
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
+1
On 8 May 2012 12:39, Spring Zhang spring.zhang@linaro.org wrote:
+1, we can have our own channel like ML.
On 8 May 2012 15:08, Dave Pigott dave.pigott@linaro.org wrote:
+1 - Very good idea. Can have a more focussed set of discussions this way.
Dave
On 7 May 2012, at 20:21, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
Hi folks.
I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to "lava".
This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and public logs, much like we have on #linaro today. So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the participants to move to #linaro-lava
Thanks Zygmunt Krynicki
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
-- Best wishes, Spring Zhang
linaro-validation mailing list linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
On Mon, 7 May 2012 21:21:25 +0200, Zygmunt Krynicki zygmunt.krynicki@linaro.org wrote:
Hi folks.
I'd like to propose that we keep all the lava discussion in #linaro-lava if possible, this will allow participants, who are not working for linaro, to join and quickly identify people that share the interest in our common framework. The channel name is a compromise between unavailable #lava (already owned by unrelated project) and staying in #linaro (that sees a fair amount of unrelated traffic). I also considered #linaro-validation but I think we have agreed in the past that we want to transition away from the "validation" keyword to "lava".
This is not formally done yet, I'd like to have a chanserv registry (I think all #linaro-* channels are automatically managed though) and public logs, much like we have on #linaro today. So, if you support this idea and find yourself talking or observing a discussion about LAVA in #linaro please gently suggest the participants to move to #linaro-lava
+1, but we should announce the new channel to linaro-dev as well.
Cheers, mwh
linaro-validation@lists.linaro.org
-
Dave Pigott -
Le.chi Thu -
Michael Hudson-Doyle -
Spring Zhang -
Zygmunt Krynicki