Hi Vincenzo,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:06 PM Vincenzo Frascino vincenzo.frascino@arm.com wrote:
On arm64 the TCR_EL1.TBI0 bit has been always enabled hence the userspace (EL0) is allowed to set a non-zero value in the top byte but the resulting pointers are not allowed at the user-kernel syscall ABI boundary.
With the relaxed ABI proposed through this document, it is now possible to pass tagged pointers to the syscalls, when these pointers are in memory ranges obtained by an anonymous (MAP_ANONYMOUS) mmap() or brk().
This change in the ABI requires a mechanism to inform the userspace that such an option is available.
Specify and document the way in which AT_FLAGS can be used to advertise this feature to the userspace.
Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com CC: Andrey Konovalov andreyknvl@google.com Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino vincenzo.frascino@arm.com
Squash with "arm64: Define Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt"
Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt b/Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9b3494207c14 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/arm64/elf_at_flags.txt @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@ +ARM64 ELF AT_FLAGS +==================
+This document describes the usage and semantics of AT_FLAGS on arm64.
+1. Introduction +---------------
+AT_FLAGS is part of the Auxiliary Vector, contains the flags and it +is set to zero by the kernel on arm64 unless one or more of the +features detailed in paragraph 2 are present.
+The auxiliary vector can be accessed by the userspace using the +getauxval() API provided by the C library. +getauxval() returns an unsigned long and when a flag is present in +the AT_FLAGS, the corresponding bit in the returned value is set to 1.
+The AT_FLAGS with a "defined semantics" on arm64 are exposed to the +userspace via user API (uapi/asm/atflags.h). +The AT_FLAGS bits with "undefined semantics" are set to zero by default. +This means that the AT_FLAGS bits to which this document does not assign +an explicit meaning are to be intended reserved for future use. +The kernel will populate all such bits with zero until meanings are +assigned to them. If and when meanings are assigned, it is guaranteed +that they will not impact the functional operation of existing userspace +software. Userspace software should ignore any AT_FLAGS bit whose meaning +is not defined when the software is written.
+The userspace software can test for features by acquiring the AT_FLAGS +entry of the auxiliary vector, and testing whether a relevant flag +is set.
+Example of a userspace test function:
+bool feature_x_is_present(void) +{
unsigned long at_flags = getauxval(AT_FLAGS);if (at_flags & FEATURE_X)return true;return false;+}
+Where the software relies on a feature advertised by AT_FLAGS, it +must check that the feature is present before attempting to +use it.
+2. Features exposed via AT_FLAGS +--------------------------------
+bit[0]: ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI
- On arm64 the TCR_EL1.TBI0 bit has been always enabled on the arm64
- kernel, hence the userspace (EL0) is allowed to set a non-zero value
- in the top byte but the resulting pointers are not allowed at the
- user-kernel syscall ABI boundary.
- When bit[0] is set to 1 the kernel is advertising to the userspace
- that a relaxed ABI is supported hence this type of pointers are now
- allowed to be passed to the syscalls, when these pointers are in
- memory ranges privately owned by a process and obtained by the
- process in accordance with the definition of "valid tagged pointer"
- in paragraph 3.
- In these cases the tag is preserved as the pointer goes through the
- kernel. Only when the kernel needs to check if a pointer is coming
- from userspace an untag operation is required.
+3. ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI +-----------------------------
+From the kernel syscall interface prospective, we define, for the purposes +of this document, a "valid tagged pointer" as a pointer that either it has +a zero value set in the top byte or it has a non-zero value, it is in memory +ranges privately owned by a userspace process and it is obtained in one of +the following ways:
- mmap() done by the process itself, where either:
- flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS
- flags = MAP_PRIVATE and the file descriptor refers to a regular
file or "/dev/zero"
- a mapping below sbrk(0) done by the process itself
- any memory mapped by the kernel in the process's address space during
- creation and following the restrictions presented above (i.e. data, bss,
- stack).
+When the ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI flag is set by the kernel, the following +behaviours are guaranteed by the ABI:
- Every current or newly introduced syscall can accept any valid tagged
- pointers.
- If a non valid tagged pointer is passed to a syscall then the behaviour
- is undefined.
- Every valid tagged pointer is expected to work as an untagged one.
- The kernel preserves any valid tagged pointers and returns them to the
- userspace unchanged in all the cases except the ones documented in the
- "Preserving tags" paragraph of tagged-pointers.txt.
+A definition of the meaning of tagged pointers on arm64 can be found in: +Documentation/arm64/tagged-pointers.txt.
+Example of correct usage (pseudo-code) for a userspace application:
+bool arm64_syscall_tbi_is_present(void) +{
unsigned long at_flags = getauxval(AT_FLAGS);if (at_flags & ARM64_AT_FLAGS_SYSCALL_TBI)return true;return false;+}
+void main(void) +{
char *addr = mmap(NULL, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);int fd = open("test.txt", O_WRONLY);/* Check if the relaxed ABI is supported */if (arm64_syscall_tbi_is_present()) {/* Add a tag to the pointer */addr = tag_pointer(addr);}strcpy("Hello World\n", addr);
Nit: s/strcpy("Hello World\n", addr)/strcpy(addr, "Hello World\n")
Thanks, Amit D
/* Write to a file */write(fd, addr, sizeof(addr));close(fd);+}
-- 2.21.0
linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel