On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:03 PM Kuehling, Felix Felix.Kuehling@amd.com wrote:
On 2019-04-30 9:25 a.m., Andrey Konovalov wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]
This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
amdgpu_ttm_tt_get_user_pages() uses provided user pointers for vma lookups, which can only by done with untagged pointers. This patch untag user pointers when they are being set in amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_userptr().
In amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl() and amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c/init_user_pages() an MMU notifier is set up with a (tagged) userspace pointer. The untagged address should be used so that MMU notifiers for the untagged address get correctly matched up with the right BO. This patch untag user pointers in amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl() for the GEM case and in amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu() for the KFD case.
Suggested-by: Kuehling, Felix Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov andreyknvl@google.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c index 1921dec3df7a..20cac44ed449 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu( alloc_flags = 0; if (!offset || !*offset) return -EINVAL;
user_addr = *offset;
user_addr = untagged_addr(*offset); } else if (flags & ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_DOORBELL) { domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT; alloc_domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c index d21dd2f369da..985cb82b2aa6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c @@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ int amdgpu_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, uint32_t handle; int r;
args->addr = untagged_addr(args->addr);if (offset_in_page(args->addr | args->size)) return -EINVAL;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c index 73e71e61dc99..1d30e97ac2c4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_tt_set_userptr(struct ttm_tt *ttm, uint64_t addr, if (gtt == NULL) return -EINVAL;
gtt->userptr = addr;
gtt->userptr = untagged_addr(addr);Doing this here seems unnecessary. You already untagged the address in both callers of this function. Untagging in the two callers ensures that the userptr and MMU notifier are in sync, using the same untagged address. Doing it again here is redundant.
Will fix in v15, thanks!
Regards, Felix
gtt->userflags = flags; if (gtt->usertask)-- 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog