On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Wieczor-Retman, Maciej wrote:
Many calls to ksft print functions have format strings that don't match with other passed arguments. One call expects a string but doesn't provide any argument after the format string.
Fix format specifiers so they match the passed variables.
Add a missing variable to ksft_test_result_pass() inside pidfd_fdinfo_test() so it matches other cases in the switch statement.
Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman, Maciej maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com
tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c index 4e86f927880c..01cc37bf611c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_fdinfo_test.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static void error_report(struct error *err, const char *test_name) break; case PIDFD_PASS:
ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n");
ksft_test_result_pass("%s test: Passed\n", test_name);
Missing test_name leads to crash so this looks a Fixes: class thing for me but you didn't provide one.
break;default: diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c index 00a07e7c571c..c081ae91313a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_test.c @@ -381,13 +381,13 @@ static int test_pidfd_send_signal_syscall_support(void) static void *test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread(void *priv) {
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n",
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: doing exec of sleep\n");
execl("/bin/sleep", "sleep", str(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT), (char *)NULL);
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n",
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); return NULL;
} @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static int child_poll_exec_test(void *args) { pthread_t t1;
- ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(),
- ksft_print_msg("Child (pidfd): starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_exec_thread, NULL); /*
@@ -480,10 +480,10 @@ static void test_pidfd_poll_exec(int use_waitpid) static void *test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread(void *priv) {
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %d ; and sleeping\n",
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: starting. pid %d tid %ld ; and sleeping\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); sleep(CHILD_THREAD_MIN_WAIT);
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
- ksft_print_msg("Child Thread: DONE. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); return NULL;
} @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static int child_poll_leader_exit_test(void *args) { pthread_t t1, t2;
- ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %d\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid));
- ksft_print_msg("Child: starting. pid %d tid %ld\n", getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid)); pthread_create(&t1, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL); pthread_create(&t2, NULL, test_pidfd_poll_leader_exit_thread, NULL);