On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:06 PM Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:46:58 -0800 Jeff Xu jeffxu@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 12:35 PM Kees Cook keescook@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:11:44AM -0800, Jeff Xu wrote:
Once per boot seems too little, it would be nice if we can list all processes. I agree ratelimited might be too much. There is a feature gap here for logging.
Kees, what do you think ?
I agree once per boot is kind of frustrating "I fixed the one warning, oh, now it's coming from a different process". But ratelimit is, in retrospect, still too often.
Let's go with per boot -- this should be noisy "enough" to get the changes in API into the callers without being too much of a hassle.
Agreed. Let's go with per boot.
Hi Andrew, what is your preference ? I can send a patch or you directly fix it in mm-unstable ?
Like this?
Yes. Thanks!
--- a/mm/memfd.c~mm-memfd-add-mfd_noexec_seal-and-mfd_exec-fix-3 +++ a/mm/memfd.c @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, flags |= MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL; break; default:
pr_warn_ratelimited(
pr_warn_once( "memfd_create(): MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL is enforced, pid=%d '%s'\n", task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); return -EINVAL;
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, #else flags |= MFD_EXEC; #endif
pr_warn_ratelimited(
pr_warn_once( "memfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=%d '%s'\n", task_pid_nr(current), get_task_comm(comm, current)); }
_