On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:38 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
[...]
I think that this patch is an improvement independent of the patch-set. Please submit it separately.
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
[...]
@@ -489,6 +494,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void) ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map"); bpf_link__destroy(link); +err:
Nit: there are two links in this test, but ASSERT_OK_PTR is added only for a single one. Also note that bpf_link__destroy(NULL) works just fine, so it is possible to initialize links as NULL and make a jump to cleanup block w/o peeking exact position within that block.
bpf_link__destroy(link_nl); tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel); }
[...]