In the liointc hardware, there are different ISRs (i.e. Interrupt Status
Registers) for different cores. We always use core#0's ISR before but it
has no problem, this is because the interrupts are routed to core#0 by
default. If we change the routing (which can be done by changing firmware
configuration) then we will lose interrupts while CPU hotplugging, so we
should set correct ISRs for different cores.
Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Tianli Xiong <xiongtianli(a)loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tianli Xiong <xiongtianli(a)loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai(a)loongson.cn>
---
V2: Update commit messages.
drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
index e4b33aed1c97..7c4fe7ab4b83 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-liointc.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#define LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START 0x20
-#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x20)
+#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS(core) (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x20 + (core) * 8)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_EN_STATUS (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x04)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_ENABLE (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x08)
#define LIOINTC_REG_INTC_DISABLE (LIOINTC_INTC_CHIP_START + 0x0c)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int liointc_init(phys_addr_t addr, unsigned long size, int revision,
goto out_free_priv;
for (i = 0; i < LIOINTC_NUM_CORES; i++)
- priv->core_isr[i] = base + LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS;
+ priv->core_isr[i] = base + LIOINTC_REG_INTC_STATUS(i);
for (i = 0; i < LIOINTC_NUM_PARENT; i++)
priv->handler[i].parent_int_map = parent_int_map[i];
--
2.43.0
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
[ Upstream commit ed8c7fbdfe117abbef81f65428ba263118ef298a ]
The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.
Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.
Fix this check.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
fs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 928ba7b8df1e9..f5ba0e6f1a4c6 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -462,12 +462,12 @@ struct files_struct init_files = {
static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
{
- unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
+ unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds; /* always multiple of BITS_PER_LONG */
unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
- if (bitbit > maxfd)
+ if (bitbit >= maxfd)
return maxfd;
if (bitbit > start)
start = bitbit;
--
2.43.0
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
[ Upstream commit ed8c7fbdfe117abbef81f65428ba263118ef298a ]
The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.
Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.
Fix this check.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
fs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index e56059fa1b309..64892b7444191 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -462,12 +462,12 @@ struct files_struct init_files = {
static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
{
- unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
+ unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds; /* always multiple of BITS_PER_LONG */
unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
- if (bitbit > maxfd)
+ if (bitbit >= maxfd)
return maxfd;
if (bitbit > start)
start = bitbit;
--
2.43.0
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
[ Upstream commit ed8c7fbdfe117abbef81f65428ba263118ef298a ]
The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.
Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.
Fix this check.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
fs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index fdb84a64724b7..913f7d897d2fc 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -494,12 +494,12 @@ struct files_struct init_files = {
static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
{
- unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
+ unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds; /* always multiple of BITS_PER_LONG */
unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
- if (bitbit > maxfd)
+ if (bitbit >= maxfd)
return maxfd;
if (bitbit > start)
start = bitbit;
--
2.43.0
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
[ Upstream commit ed8c7fbdfe117abbef81f65428ba263118ef298a ]
The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.
Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.
Fix this check.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang(a)linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org>
---
fs/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 69a51d37b66d9..b46a4a725a0ef 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -481,12 +481,12 @@ struct files_struct init_files = {
static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
{
- unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds;
+ unsigned int maxfd = fdt->max_fds; /* always multiple of BITS_PER_LONG */
unsigned int maxbit = maxfd / BITS_PER_LONG;
unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
- if (bitbit > maxfd)
+ if (bitbit >= maxfd)
return maxfd;
if (bitbit > start)
start = bitbit;
--
2.43.0