July 2024 - Linux-stable-mirror

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072936-harvest-drown-bd07@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 49ae997f8f0d ("nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn(). As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case). The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking. Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages. Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8 Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3 Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c index 52e50b1b7f22..dddfa604491a 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto Enamelen; if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~(chunk_size-1)) goto Espan; + if (unlikely(p->inode && + NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(le64_to_cpu(p->inode)))) + goto Einumber; } if (offs != limit) goto Eend; @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto bad_entry; Espan: error = "directory entry across blocks"; + goto bad_entry; +Einumber: + error = "disallowed inode number"; bad_entry: nilfs_error(sb, "bad entry in directory #%lu: %s - offset=%lu, inode=%lu, rec_len=%zd, name_len=%d", diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 7e39e277c77f..4017f7856440 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum { ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) +#define NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(ino) ({ \ + ino_t __ino = (ino); \ + ((__ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (__ino) != NILFS_ROOT_INO && \ + (__ino) != NILFS_SKETCH_INO); }) + /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization * @ti_magic: Magic number

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072935-october-footer-b2ed@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 49ae997f8f0d ("nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn(). As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case). The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking. Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages. Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8 Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3 Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c index 52e50b1b7f22..dddfa604491a 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto Enamelen; if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~(chunk_size-1)) goto Espan; + if (unlikely(p->inode && + NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(le64_to_cpu(p->inode)))) + goto Einumber; } if (offs != limit) goto Eend; @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto bad_entry; Espan: error = "directory entry across blocks"; + goto bad_entry; +Einumber: + error = "disallowed inode number"; bad_entry: nilfs_error(sb, "bad entry in directory #%lu: %s - offset=%lu, inode=%lu, rec_len=%zd, name_len=%d", diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 7e39e277c77f..4017f7856440 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum { ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) +#define NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(ino) ({ \ + ino_t __ino = (ino); \ + ((__ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (__ino) != NILFS_ROOT_INO && \ + (__ino) != NILFS_SKETCH_INO); }) + /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization * @ti_magic: Magic number

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072934-durable-scuttle-9c45@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 49ae997f8f0d ("nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn(). As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case). The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking. Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages. Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8 Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3 Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c index 52e50b1b7f22..dddfa604491a 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto Enamelen; if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~(chunk_size-1)) goto Espan; + if (unlikely(p->inode && + NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(le64_to_cpu(p->inode)))) + goto Einumber; } if (offs != limit) goto Eend; @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto bad_entry; Espan: error = "directory entry across blocks"; + goto bad_entry; +Einumber: + error = "disallowed inode number"; bad_entry: nilfs_error(sb, "bad entry in directory #%lu: %s - offset=%lu, inode=%lu, rec_len=%zd, name_len=%d", diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 7e39e277c77f..4017f7856440 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum { ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) +#define NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(ino) ({ \ + ino_t __ino = (ino); \ + ((__ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (__ino) != NILFS_ROOT_INO && \ + (__ino) != NILFS_SKETCH_INO); }) + /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization * @ti_magic: Magic number

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072933-unhappily-flashy-46e1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 49ae997f8f0d ("nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn(). As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case). The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking. Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages. Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8 Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3 Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c index 52e50b1b7f22..dddfa604491a 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto Enamelen; if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~(chunk_size-1)) goto Espan; + if (unlikely(p->inode && + NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(le64_to_cpu(p->inode)))) + goto Einumber; } if (offs != limit) goto Eend; @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto bad_entry; Espan: error = "directory entry across blocks"; + goto bad_entry; +Einumber: + error = "disallowed inode number"; bad_entry: nilfs_error(sb, "bad entry in directory #%lu: %s - offset=%lu, inode=%lu, rec_len=%zd, name_len=%d", diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 7e39e277c77f..4017f7856440 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum { ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) +#define NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(ino) ({ \ + ino_t __ino = (ino); \ + ((__ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (__ino) != NILFS_ROOT_INO && \ + (__ino) != NILFS_SKETCH_INO); }) + /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization * @ti_magic: Magic number

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory" failed to apply to 6.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072932-sage-amazingly-1d3e@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 49ae997f8f0d ("nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 49ae997f8f0d5e268bbd271c5fd66166ce8287fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: add missing check for inode numbers on directory entries Syzbot reported that mounting and unmounting a specific pattern of corrupted nilfs2 filesystem images causes a use-after-free of metadata file inodes, which triggers a kernel bug in lru_add_fn(). As Jan Kara pointed out, this is because the link count of a metadata file gets corrupted to 0, and nilfs_evict_inode(), which is called from iput(), tries to delete that inode (ifile inode in this case). The inconsistency occurs because directories containing the inode numbers of these metadata files that should not be visible in the namespace are read without checking. Fix this issue by treating the inode numbers of these internal files as errors in the sanity check helper when reading directory folios/pages. Also thanks to Hillf Danton and Matthew Wilcox for their initial mm-layer analysis. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-3-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+d79afb004be235636ee8(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d79afb004be235636ee8 Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617075758.wewhukbrjod5fp5o@quack3 Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c index 52e50b1b7f22..dddfa604491a 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/dir.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/dir.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto Enamelen; if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~(chunk_size-1)) goto Espan; + if (unlikely(p->inode && + NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(le64_to_cpu(p->inode)))) + goto Einumber; } if (offs != limit) goto Eend; @@ -160,6 +163,9 @@ static bool nilfs_check_folio(struct folio *folio, char *kaddr) goto bad_entry; Espan: error = "directory entry across blocks"; + goto bad_entry; +Einumber: + error = "disallowed inode number"; bad_entry: nilfs_error(sb, "bad entry in directory #%lu: %s - offset=%lu, inode=%lu, rec_len=%zd, name_len=%d", diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 7e39e277c77f..4017f7856440 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -121,6 +121,11 @@ enum { ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) +#define NILFS_PRIVATE_INODE(ino) ({ \ + ino_t __ino = (ino); \ + ((__ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (__ino) != NILFS_ROOT_INO && \ + (__ino) != NILFS_SKETCH_INO); }) + /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization * @ti_magic: Magic number

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072930-clover-wool-670c@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ab8425091db ("nilfs2: fix inode number range checks") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes". This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. This patch (of 3): In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked. As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly. In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment. Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros. Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 728e90be3570..7e39e277c77f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ enum { #define NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) (((struct the_nilfs *)sb->s_fs_info)->ns_first_ino) #define NILFS_MDT_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) < NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) #define NILFS_VALID_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index f41d7b6d432c..e44dde57ab65 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ static int nilfs_store_disk_layout(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, } nilfs->ns_first_ino = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_first_ino); + if (nilfs->ns_first_ino < NILFS_USER_INO) { + nilfs_err(nilfs->ns_sb, + "too small lower limit for non-reserved inode numbers: %u", + nilfs->ns_first_ino); + return -EINVAL; + } nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); if (nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS) { diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h index 85da0629415d..1e829ed7b0ef 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct the_nilfs { unsigned long ns_nrsvsegs; unsigned long ns_first_data_block; int ns_inode_size; - int ns_first_ino; + unsigned int ns_first_ino; u32 ns_crc_seed; /* /sys/fs/<nilfs>/<device> */

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072929-dreamy-fable-db92@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ab8425091db ("nilfs2: fix inode number range checks") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes". This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. This patch (of 3): In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked. As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly. In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment. Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros. Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 728e90be3570..7e39e277c77f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ enum { #define NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) (((struct the_nilfs *)sb->s_fs_info)->ns_first_ino) #define NILFS_MDT_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) < NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) #define NILFS_VALID_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index f41d7b6d432c..e44dde57ab65 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ static int nilfs_store_disk_layout(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, } nilfs->ns_first_ino = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_first_ino); + if (nilfs->ns_first_ino < NILFS_USER_INO) { + nilfs_err(nilfs->ns_sb, + "too small lower limit for non-reserved inode numbers: %u", + nilfs->ns_first_ino); + return -EINVAL; + } nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); if (nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS) { diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h index 85da0629415d..1e829ed7b0ef 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct the_nilfs { unsigned long ns_nrsvsegs; unsigned long ns_first_data_block; int ns_inode_size; - int ns_first_ino; + unsigned int ns_first_ino; u32 ns_crc_seed; /* /sys/fs/<nilfs>/<device> */

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072928-childless-tremble-2776@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ab8425091db ("nilfs2: fix inode number range checks") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes". This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. This patch (of 3): In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked. As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly. In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment. Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros. Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 728e90be3570..7e39e277c77f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ enum { #define NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) (((struct the_nilfs *)sb->s_fs_info)->ns_first_ino) #define NILFS_MDT_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) < NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) #define NILFS_VALID_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index f41d7b6d432c..e44dde57ab65 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ static int nilfs_store_disk_layout(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, } nilfs->ns_first_ino = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_first_ino); + if (nilfs->ns_first_ino < NILFS_USER_INO) { + nilfs_err(nilfs->ns_sb, + "too small lower limit for non-reserved inode numbers: %u", + nilfs->ns_first_ino); + return -EINVAL; + } nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); if (nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS) { diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h index 85da0629415d..1e829ed7b0ef 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct the_nilfs { unsigned long ns_nrsvsegs; unsigned long ns_first_data_block; int ns_inode_size; - int ns_first_ino; + unsigned int ns_first_ino; u32 ns_crc_seed; /* /sys/fs/<nilfs>/<device> */

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072926-jawless-untracked-60f3@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ab8425091db ("nilfs2: fix inode number range checks") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes". This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. This patch (of 3): In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked. As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly. In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment. Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros. Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 728e90be3570..7e39e277c77f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ enum { #define NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) (((struct the_nilfs *)sb->s_fs_info)->ns_first_ino) #define NILFS_MDT_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) < NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) #define NILFS_VALID_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index f41d7b6d432c..e44dde57ab65 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ static int nilfs_store_disk_layout(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, } nilfs->ns_first_ino = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_first_ino); + if (nilfs->ns_first_ino < NILFS_USER_INO) { + nilfs_err(nilfs->ns_sb, + "too small lower limit for non-reserved inode numbers: %u", + nilfs->ns_first_ino); + return -EINVAL; + } nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); if (nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS) { diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h index 85da0629415d..1e829ed7b0ef 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct the_nilfs { unsigned long ns_nrsvsegs; unsigned long ns_first_data_block; int ns_inode_size; - int ns_first_ino; + unsigned int ns_first_ino; u32 ns_crc_seed; /* /sys/fs/<nilfs>/<device> */

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

by gregkh＠linuxfoundation.org

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <stable(a)vger.kernel.org>. To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands: git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to '<stable(a)vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024072925-squatter-waffle-122d@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^.. Possible dependencies: 1ab8425091db ("nilfs2: fix inode number range checks") thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ From 1ab8425091dba7ce8bf59e09e183aaca6c2a12ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:11:33 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: fix inode number range checks Patch series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes". This series fixes one use-after-free issue reported by syzbot, caused by nilfs2's internal inode being exposed in the namespace on a corrupted filesystem, and a couple of flaws that cause problems if the starting number of non-reserved inodes written in the on-disk super block is intentionally (or corruptly) changed from its default value. This patch (of 3): In the current implementation of nilfs2, "nilfs->ns_first_ino", which gives the first non-reserved inode number, is read from the superblock, but its lower limit is not checked. As a result, if a number that overlaps with the inode number range of reserved inodes such as the root directory or metadata files is set in the super block parameter, the inode number test macros (NILFS_MDT_INODE and NILFS_VALID_INODE) will not function properly. In addition, these test macros use left bit-shift calculations using with the inode number as the shift count via the BIT macro, but the result of a shift calculation that exceeds the bit width of an integer is undefined in the C specification, so if "ns_first_ino" is set to a large value other than the default value NILFS_USER_INO (=11), the macros may potentially malfunction depending on the environment. Fix these issues by checking the lower bound of "nilfs->ns_first_ino" and by preventing bit shifts equal to or greater than the NILFS_USER_INO constant in the inode number test macros. Also, change the type of "ns_first_ino" from signed integer to unsigned integer to avoid the need for type casting in comparisons such as the lower bound check introduced this time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240623051135.4180-2-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke(a)gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton(a)sina.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy(a)infradead.org> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 728e90be3570..7e39e277c77f 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@ -116,9 +116,10 @@ enum { #define NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) (((struct the_nilfs *)sb->s_fs_info)->ns_first_ino) #define NILFS_MDT_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) < NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_MDT_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) #define NILFS_VALID_INODE(sb, ino) \ - ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino))) + ((ino) >= NILFS_FIRST_INO(sb) || \ + ((ino) < NILFS_USER_INO && (NILFS_SYS_INO_BITS & BIT(ino)))) /** * struct nilfs_transaction_info: context information for synchronization diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c index f41d7b6d432c..e44dde57ab65 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c @@ -452,6 +452,12 @@ static int nilfs_store_disk_layout(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, } nilfs->ns_first_ino = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_first_ino); + if (nilfs->ns_first_ino < NILFS_USER_INO) { + nilfs_err(nilfs->ns_sb, + "too small lower limit for non-reserved inode numbers: %u", + nilfs->ns_first_ino); + return -EINVAL; + } nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment = le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_blocks_per_segment); if (nilfs->ns_blocks_per_segment < NILFS_SEG_MIN_BLOCKS) { diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h index 85da0629415d..1e829ed7b0ef 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.h @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct the_nilfs { unsigned long ns_nrsvsegs; unsigned long ns_first_data_block; int ns_inode_size; - int ns_first_ino; + unsigned int ns_first_ino; u32 ns_crc_seed; /* /sys/fs/<nilfs>/<device> */

7 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-stable-mirror July 2024