Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: hugetlb: proc: check for hugetlb shared PMD in /proc/PID/smaps

On Fri 03-02-23 12:16:04, Mike Kravetz wrote: [...]

Unless someone thinks we should move forward, I will not push the code for this approach now. It will also be interesting to see if this is impacted at all by the outcome of discussions to perhaps redesign mapcount.

Yes, I do agree. We might want to extend page_mapcount documentation a bit though. The comment is explicit about the order-0 pages but a note about hugetlb and pmd sharing wouldn't hurt. WDYT?