From: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
[ Upstream commit 0ff7aee24e47beb4306ce050824b54147f2fabfa ]
Exiting early in remove without releasing all acquired resources yields leaks. Note that e.g. memory allocated with devm_zalloc() is freed after .remove() returns, even if the return code was negative.
While blocking_notifier_chain_unregister() won't fail and so the change is somewhat cosmetic, platform driver's .remove callbacks are about to be converted to return void. To prepare that, keep the error message but don't return early.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/media/cec/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c b/drivers/media/cec/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c index 6ebedc71d67d4..960432230bbf1 100644 --- a/drivers/media/cec/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c +++ b/drivers/media/cec/platform/cros-ec/cros-ec-cec.c @@ -332,14 +332,16 @@ static int cros_ec_cec_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; int ret;
+ /* + * blocking_notifier_chain_unregister() only fails if the notifier isn't + * in the list. We know it was added to it by .probe(), so there should + * be no need for error checking. Be cautious and still check. + */ ret = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( &cros_ec_cec->cros_ec->event_notifier, &cros_ec_cec->notifier); - - if (ret) { + if (ret) dev_err(dev, "failed to unregister notifier\n"); - return ret; - }
cec_notifier_cec_adap_unregister(cros_ec_cec->notify, cros_ec_cec->adap);