6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
[ Upstream commit f4b0cece716c95e16d973a774d5a5c5cc8cb335d ]
Pull the vblank evasion scanline calculations into their own helper to declutter intel_pipe_update_start() a bit.
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare navaremanasi@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230901130440.2085-4-ville.sy... Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com Stable-dep-of: 4a36e46df7aa ("drm/i915: Disable live M/N updates when using bigjoiner") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c index 65d91c7ad22ff..9693747a18c66 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.c @@ -468,6 +468,36 @@ static int intel_mode_vblank_start(const struct drm_display_mode *mode) return vblank_start; }
+static void intel_crtc_vblank_evade_scanlines(struct intel_atomic_state *state, + struct intel_crtc *crtc, + int *min, int *max, int *vblank_start) +{ + const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state = + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc); + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &new_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode; + + if (new_crtc_state->vrr.enable) { + if (intel_vrr_is_push_sent(new_crtc_state)) + *vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(new_crtc_state); + else + *vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmax_vblank_start(new_crtc_state); + } else { + *vblank_start = intel_mode_vblank_start(adjusted_mode); + } + + /* FIXME needs to be calibrated sensibly */ + *min = *vblank_start - intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, + VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US); + *max = *vblank_start - 1; + + /* + * M/N is double buffered on the transcoder's undelayed vblank, + * so with seamless M/N we must evade both vblanks. + */ + if (new_crtc_state->seamless_m_n && intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state)) + *min -= adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay; +} + /** * intel_pipe_update_start() - start update of a set of display registers * @state: the atomic state @@ -487,7 +517,6 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc); - const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &new_crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode; long timeout = msecs_to_jiffies_timeout(1); int scanline, min, max, vblank_start; wait_queue_head_t *wq = drm_crtc_vblank_waitqueue(&crtc->base); @@ -503,27 +532,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(struct intel_atomic_state *state, if (intel_crtc_needs_vblank_work(new_crtc_state)) intel_crtc_vblank_work_init(new_crtc_state);
- if (new_crtc_state->vrr.enable) { - if (intel_vrr_is_push_sent(new_crtc_state)) - vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(new_crtc_state); - else - vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmax_vblank_start(new_crtc_state); - } else { - vblank_start = intel_mode_vblank_start(adjusted_mode); - } - - /* FIXME needs to be calibrated sensibly */ - min = vblank_start - intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode, - VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US); - max = vblank_start - 1; - - /* - * M/N is double buffered on the transcoder's undelayed vblank, - * so with seamless M/N we must evade both vblanks. - */ - if (new_crtc_state->seamless_m_n && intel_crtc_needs_fastset(new_crtc_state)) - min -= adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay; - + intel_crtc_vblank_evade_scanlines(state, crtc, &min, &max, &vblank_start); if (min <= 0 || max <= 0) goto irq_disable;