4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Feras Daoud ferasda@mellanox.com
[ Upstream commit 27d41d29c7f093f6f77843624fbb080c1b4a8b9c ]
Since ipoib_cm_tx_start function and ipoib_cm_tx_reap function belong to different work queues, they can run in parallel. In this case if ipoib_cm_tx_reap calls list_del and release the lock, ipoib_cm_tx_start may acquire it and call list_del_init on the already deleted object. Changing list_del to list_del_init in ipoib_cm_tx_reap fixes the problem.
Fixes: 839fcaba355a ("IPoIB: Connected mode experimental support") Signed-off-by: Feras Daoud ferasda@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Erez Shitrit erezsh@mellanox.com Reviewed-by: Alex Vesker valex@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia yuval.shaia@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford dledford@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c @@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static void ipoib_cm_tx_reap(struct work
while (!list_empty(&priv->cm.reap_list)) { p = list_entry(priv->cm.reap_list.next, typeof(*p), list); - list_del(&p->list); + list_del_init(&p->list); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags); netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev); ipoib_cm_tx_destroy(p);