5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org
commit a215b5723922f8099078478122f02100e489cb80 upstream.
Commit under Fixes tightened up the memory accounting for Netlink sockets. Looks like the accounting is too strict for some existing use cases, Marek reported issues with nl80211 / WiFi iw CLI.
To reduce number of iterations Netlink dumps try to allocate messages based on the size of the buffer passed to previous recvmsg() calls. If user space uses a larger buffer in recvmsg() than sk_rcvbuf we will allocate an skb we won't be able to queue.
Make sure we always allow at least one skb to be queued. Same workaround is already present in netlink_attachskb(). Alternative would be to cap the allocation size to rcvbuf - rmem_alloc but as I said, the workaround is already present in other places.
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/9794af18-4905-46c6-b12c-365ea2f05858@samsung.com Fixes: ae8f160e7eb2 ("netlink: Fix wraparounds of sk->sk_rmem_alloc.") Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@google.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250711001121.3649033-1-kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c @@ -2211,11 +2211,11 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, struct netlink_ext_ack extack = {}; struct netlink_callback *cb; struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; + unsigned int rmem, rcvbuf; size_t max_recvmsg_len; struct module *module; int err = -ENOBUFS; int alloc_min_size; - unsigned int rmem; int alloc_size;
if (!lock_taken) @@ -2247,8 +2247,9 @@ static int netlink_dump(struct sock *sk, if (!skb) goto errout_skb;
+ rcvbuf = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf); rmem = atomic_add_return(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc); - if (rmem >= READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf)) { + if (rmem != skb->truesize && rmem >= rcvbuf) { atomic_sub(skb->truesize, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc); goto errout_skb; }