From: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit e16fdd4f754048d6e23c56bd8d920b71e41e3777 ]
damon_test_regions() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251101182021.74868-3-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park sj@kernel.org Cc: Brendan Higgins brendan.higgins@linux.dev Cc: David Gow davidgow@google.com Cc: Kefeng Wang wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [5.15+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- mm/damon/core-test.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h index 6cc8b245586d..23a6d3ae9aed 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h @@ -20,11 +20,17 @@ static void damon_test_regions(struct kunit *test) struct damon_target *t;
r = damon_new_region(1, 2); + if (!r) + kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail"); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ul, r->ar.start); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2ul, r->ar.end); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, r->nr_accesses);
t = damon_new_target(); + if (!t) { + damon_free_region(r); + kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail"); + } KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0u, damon_nr_regions(t));
damon_add_region(r, t);