On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi greg,
On 15-Dec-25 9:12 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
commit eb296c09805ee37dd4ea520a7fb3ec157c31090f upstream.
SI hardware doesn't support pasids, user mode queues, or KIQ/MES so there is no need for this. Doing so results in a segfault as these callbacks are non-existent for SI.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/4744 Fixes: f3854e04b708 ("drm/amdgpu: attach tlb fence to the PTs update") Reviewed-by: Timur Kristóf timur.kristof@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
What kernel tree(s) should this go to?
This fixes a regression introduced in at least 6.17.y (6.17.11) and 6.18.y (6.18.1). So it should at least go to those branches.
But that commit is in 6.19-rc1, not anything older.
If any other branches also have gotten commit f3854e04b708 backported then those should get this too.
I don't see that commit in any stable tree, what am I missing?
confused,
greg k-h