Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
Thank you
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
Thanks, Szabolcs
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
thansk,
greg k-h
On 11/16/21 7:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
btw while you're bringing it up, is there some sure-fire method I can use to verify the patch is in Linus tree, besides having a separate checkout of that tree ?
I usually have both Linus tree as origin and next in one git tree, so I was wondering if there is a recommended way to avoid mistakes like the one I made above (and checking at git.kernel.org apparently also has its downsides).
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/16/21 7:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
btw while you're bringing it up, is there some sure-fire method I can use to verify the patch is in Linus tree, besides having a separate checkout of that tree ?
Without the tree/branch checked out? Not that I know of, sorry.
I usually have both Linus tree as origin and next in one git tree, so I was wondering if there is a recommended way to avoid mistakes like the one I made above (and checking at git.kernel.org apparently also has its downsides).
Having both in one git tree is fine. Just switch between branches (one that tracks Linus's and one that tracks linux-next) and you can see what is happening in each of them.
There's other "tricks" to see if patches have been added to branches by adding them to a branch and then rebasing and seeing the end result, but those get tricky to try to explain in simple emails...
greg k-h
On 11/17/21 7:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/16/21 7:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
Hello everyone,
The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently:
4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
btw while you're bringing it up, is there some sure-fire method I can use to verify the patch is in Linus tree, besides having a separate checkout of that tree ?
Without the tree/branch checked out? Not that I know of, sorry.
I have a local checkout of Linus tree, except I also have other remotes in it, that's what I meant.
I usually have both Linus tree as origin and next in one git tree, so I was wondering if there is a recommended way to avoid mistakes like the one I made above (and checking at git.kernel.org apparently also has its downsides).
Having both in one git tree is fine. Just switch between branches (one that tracks Linus's and one that tracks linux-next) and you can see what is happening in each of them.
I can do some "git log linus/master | grep the-commit" , but that does not seem to be the most efficient approach, or is it ?
There's other "tricks" to see if patches have been added to branches by adding them to a branch and then rebasing and seeing the end result, but those get tricky to try to explain in simple emails...
Some sort of git-cherry-pick and git-rebase ?
All right
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/17/21 7:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/16/21 7:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently: > > 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter") > > It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on > 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick .
A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to pick it up.
thanks,
greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
btw while you're bringing it up, is there some sure-fire method I can use to verify the patch is in Linus tree, besides having a separate checkout of that tree ?
Without the tree/branch checked out? Not that I know of, sorry.
I have a local checkout of Linus tree, except I also have other remotes in it, that's what I meant.
I usually have both Linus tree as origin and next in one git tree, so I was wondering if there is a recommended way to avoid mistakes like the one I made above (and checking at git.kernel.org apparently also has its downsides).
Having both in one git tree is fine. Just switch between branches (one that tracks Linus's and one that tracks linux-next) and you can see what is happening in each of them.
I can do some "git log linus/master | grep the-commit" , but that does not seem to be the most efficient approach, or is it ?
git log linux/master path/to/file/you/care/about.c
will give you just the log of the specific file as you know what one you are looking for here, right?
There's other "tricks" to see if patches have been added to branches by adding them to a branch and then rebasing and seeing the end result, but those get tricky to try to explain in simple emails...
Some sort of git-cherry-pick and git-rebase ?
Yes, create a branch: git checkout -b my_new_branch linux/master add the patch git cherry-pick SHA_to_pick
And then later on after you have updated linux/master: git rebase linux/master and see if anything is still left here or not: git log linux/master..HEAD
if the commit is merged, then the log will be empty.
have fun!
greg k-h
On 11/18/21 9:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/17/21 7:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:58:15PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/16/21 7:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 06:41:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Sipos wrote:
On 10/11/21 09:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> The following new device USB ID has landed in linux-next recently: >> >> 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter") >> >> It would be nice if it could be backported to stable. I verified it works on >> 5.14.y as a simple cherry-pick . > > A patch needs to be in Linus's tree before we can add it to the stable > releases. Please let us know when it gets there and we will be glad to > pick it up. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Hello Greg,
The patch has reached Linus's tree: 4fd6d4907961 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for TP-Link UB500 Adapter")
Could you please add it to stable (5.15.y)?
I will queue it up for the next set of kernels after the current ones are released.
btw while you're bringing it up, is there some sure-fire method I can use to verify the patch is in Linus tree, besides having a separate checkout of that tree ?
Without the tree/branch checked out? Not that I know of, sorry.
I have a local checkout of Linus tree, except I also have other remotes in it, that's what I meant.
I usually have both Linus tree as origin and next in one git tree, so I was wondering if there is a recommended way to avoid mistakes like the one I made above (and checking at git.kernel.org apparently also has its downsides).
Having both in one git tree is fine. Just switch between branches (one that tracks Linus's and one that tracks linux-next) and you can see what is happening in each of them.
I can do some "git log linus/master | grep the-commit" , but that does not seem to be the most efficient approach, or is it ?
git log linux/master path/to/file/you/care/about.c
will give you just the log of the specific file as you know what one you are looking for here, right?
There's other "tricks" to see if patches have been added to branches by adding them to a branch and then rebasing and seeing the end result, but those get tricky to try to explain in simple emails...
Some sort of git-cherry-pick and git-rebase ?
Yes, create a branch: git checkout -b my_new_branch linux/master add the patch git cherry-pick SHA_to_pick
And then later on after you have updated linux/master: git rebase linux/master and see if anything is still left here or not: git log linux/master..HEAD
if the commit is merged, then the log will be empty.
Thanks
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Marek Vasut -
Szabolcs Sipos