This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.6.2-rc1
Georg Müller georgmueller@gmx.net platform/x86: pmc_atom: Add Lex 2I385SW to critclk_systems DMI table
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com vt: vt_ioctl: fix use-after-free in vt_in_use()
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com vt: vt_ioctl: fix VT_DISALLOCATE freeing in-use virtual console
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com vt: vt_ioctl: remove unnecessary console allocation checks
Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz vt: switch vt_dont_switch to bool
Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz vt: ioctl, switch VT_IS_IN_USE and VT_BUSY to inlines
Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz vt: selection, introduce vc_is_sel
Lanqing Liu liuhhome@gmail.com serial: sprd: Fix a dereference warning
Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com mac80211: fix authentication with iwlwifi/mvm
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: update jmp32 test cases to fix range bound deduction
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- drivers/platform/x86/pmc_atom.c | 8 +++ drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c | 3 +- drivers/tty/vt/selection.c | 5 ++ drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 30 +++++++++-- drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 75 +++++++++++++++------------- include/linux/selection.h | 4 +- include/linux/vt_kern.h | 2 +- net/mac80211/tx.c | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c | 9 ++-- 10 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
That was just horrible timing. David's email to say "holup" came in literally _one_ minute after I had sent the 5.6 announcement: my timestamps for that unfortunate thing is "3:51 PM" for my 5.6 announcement, and the email where David says "Meanwhile, we have a wireless regression, and I'll get the fix for that to you by the end of today" has a timestamp of "3:52 PM"
(Ok, so me actually tagging the tree and pushing it out happened about half an hour earlier, so it's not like it was quite that close, but I found the timing of the almost-crossed emails to be funny/sad).
Linus
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
Yeah, 5.6.1 had to go out fast, sorry I missed this patch. Luckily it seems that every distro vendor heard about it (or asked me about it) already, and have included it in their trees so the majority of users shouldn't hit this just yet.
And, if this passes Guenter's test builds quickly (hint), I can push it out quickly as well :)
thanks,
greg k-h
On 4/1/20 10:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
Yeah, 5.6.1 had to go out fast, sorry I missed this patch. Luckily it seems that every distro vendor heard about it (or asked me about it) already, and have included it in their trees so the majority of users shouldn't hit this just yet.
And, if this passes Guenter's test builds quickly (hint), I can push it out quickly as well :)
Running ... but you submitted 7 branches all in one go, so it will take a while to complete. Results should be available sometime early in the evening (PDT).
Guenter
On 4/1/20 11:22 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:06:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:19 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release.
Good. You made 5.6.1 so quickly that I didn't have time to react and say that it makes little sense without the 802.11 fix, but you're obviously making 5.6.2 quickly, so..
wifi issue I was seeing on my laptop with 5.6.0 is now resolved. Thanks for pulling this in quickly.
thanks, -- Shuah
On 4/1/20 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0
Guenter
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 05:14:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 4/1/20 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 428 pass: 428 fail: 0
Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On 01/04/2020 17:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.6: 13 builds: 13 pass, 0 fail 24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail 40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.6.2-rc1-g6c8d51f98078 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Cheers Jon
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 08:11:07AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 01/04/2020 17:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.6: 13 builds: 13 pass, 0 fail 24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail 40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.6.2-rc1-g6c8d51f98078 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Great, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.6.2-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.6.y git commit: 6c8d51f98078987586685d72fd3d66b88f3f965a git describe: v5.6.1-11-g6c8d51f98078 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.6-oe/build/v5.6.1-11-g6...
No regressions (compared to build v5.6.1)
No fixes (compared to build v5.6.1)
Ran 18887 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan
Test Suites ----------- * build * install-android-platform-tools-r2800 * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * v4l2-compliance * ltp-ipc-tests * kvm-unit-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-sched-tests
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:01:54PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 21:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.6.2 release. There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:09:36 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.6.2-rc1.g... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.6.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Great, thanks for testing all of tehse and letting me know.
greg k-h
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Linus Torvalds -
Naresh Kamboju -
shuah