This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 4.14.94-rc1
Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@arm.com KVM: arm/arm64: Fix VMID alloc race by reverting to lock-less
Vasily Averin vvs@virtuozzo.com sunrpc: use-after-free in svc_process_common()
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: track writeback errors using the generic tracking infrastructure
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: fix a potential fiemap/page fault deadlock w/ inline_data
Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu ext4: make sure enough credits are reserved for dioread_nolock writes
Ilya Dryomov idryomov@gmail.com rbd: don't return 0 on unmap if RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING is set
Ivan Mironov mironov.ivan@gmail.com drm/fb-helper: Partially bring back workaround for bugs of SDL 1.2
Yi Zeng yizeng@asrmicro.com i2c: dev: prevent adapter retries and timeout being set as minus value
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com ACPI / PMIC: xpower: Fix TS-pin current-source handling
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com ACPI: power: Skip duplicate power resource references in _PRx
Michal Hocko mhocko@suse.com mm, memcg: fix reclaim deadlock with writeback
Jan Stancek jstancek@redhat.com mm: page_mapped: don't assume compound page is huge or THP
Christoph Lameter cl@linux.com slab: alien caches must not be initialized if the allocation of the alien cache failed
Jack Stocker jackstocker.93@gmail.com USB: Add USB_QUIRK_DELAY_CTRL_MSG quirk for Corsair K70 RGB
Icenowy Zheng icenowy@aosc.io USB: storage: add quirk for SMI SM3350
Icenowy Zheng icenowy@aosc.io USB: storage: don't insert sane sense for SPC3+ when bad sense specified
Daniele Palmas dnlplm@gmail.com usb: cdc-acm: send ZLP for Telit 3G Intel based modems
Ross Lagerwall ross.lagerwall@citrix.com cifs: Fix potential OOB access of lock element array
Pavel Shilovsky pshilov@microsoft.com CIFS: Do not hide EINTR after sending network packets
Pavel Shilovsky pshilov@microsoft.com CIFS: Fix adjustment of credits for MTU requests
Kailang Yang kailang@realtek.com ALSA: hda/realtek - Disable headset Mic VREF for headset mode of ALC225
Kailang Yang kailang@realtek.com ALSA: hda/realtek - Add unplug function into unplug state of Headset Mode for ALC225
Kailang Yang kailang@realtek.com ALSA: hda/realtek - Support Dell headset mode for New AIO platform
WANG Chao chao.wang@ucloud.cn x86, modpost: Replace last remnants of RETPOLINE with CONFIG_RETPOLINE
Rik van Riel riel@redhat.com x86,kvm: move qemu/guest FPU switching out to vcpu_run
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 ++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 34 ++++----- drivers/acpi/pmic/intel_pmic_xpower.c | 41 ++++++++--- drivers/acpi/power.c | 22 ++++++ drivers/block/rbd.c | 9 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 6 ++ drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 7 ++ drivers/usb/core/quirks.c | 3 +- drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c | 8 ++- drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h | 12 ++++ fs/cifs/file.c | 8 +-- fs/cifs/smb2file.c | 4 +- fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 8 ++- fs/cifs/transport.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/fsync.c | 16 +++-- fs/ext4/inline.c | 6 +- fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +- include/linux/compiler-gcc.h | 2 +- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +- include/linux/module.h | 2 +- include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 5 +- mm/memory.c | 23 +++++++ mm/slab.c | 6 +- mm/util.c | 2 +- net/sunrpc/svc.c | 11 +-- net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 5 +- net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 2 +- scripts/mod/modpost.c | 2 +- sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 18 ++++- virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 23 +++---- 34 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
On 1/15/19 9:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
thanks, -- Shuah
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Cheers Jon
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Thanks for testing two of these.
How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as well? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Thanks for testing two of these.
How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as well? :)
We are not that advanced yet ;-)
Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing mainline and -next.
Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. However, nonetheless it is doable.
We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19?
Cheers Jon
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:56:08PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Thanks for testing two of these.
How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as well? :)
We are not that advanced yet ;-)
So not everything for those platforms is upstream? :(
Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing mainline and -next.
Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. However, nonetheless it is doable.
We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19?
I was just curious, if everything was upstream (like the boards that linaro tests for), then running 4.19 should be just the same as 4.20. But if you have big out-of-tree patchsets, that's a totally different story.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 16/01/2019 17:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:56:08PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Thanks for testing two of these.
How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as well? :)
We are not that advanced yet ;-)
So not everything for those platforms is upstream? :(
No sorry! I really was joking. We have enough upstream to test all these platforms (plus a couple more) today :-)
Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing mainline and -next.
Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. However, nonetheless it is doable.
We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19?
I was just curious, if everything was upstream (like the boards that linaro tests for), then running 4.19 should be just the same as 4.20. But if you have big out-of-tree patchsets, that's a totally different story.
Yes testing stable-v4.19/v4.20 is straight forward and will work today. I just need to go through the process of setting it up and requesting this. However, while you were asking, I was curious if you had any idea of the projected EOL for stable-v4.20 yet?
Cheers! Jon
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:38:34PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 16/01/2019 17:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:56:08PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 16/01/2019 16:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 09:25:12AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 15/01/2019 16:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests are passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.14: 8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail 16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail 14 tests: 14 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.14.94-rc1-gec31b1a Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Thanks for testing two of these.
How about 4.19 and 4.20? Does modern kernels work on this hardware as well? :)
We are not that advanced yet ;-)
So not everything for those platforms is upstream? :(
No sorry! I really was joking. We have enough upstream to test all these platforms (plus a couple more) today :-)
Only joking, absolutely and in fact we have more devices/boards supported in newer kernels so it would make sense. We are also testing mainline and -next.
Unfortunately, it is a bit of a process to add new branches at the moment simply because we are piggy backing on existing infrastructure for testing that I personally do not own and so it needs to be approved. However, nonetheless it is doable.
We were talking about adding v4.19 and then v4.20 popped up. I am not sure if you have any ideas yet about the EOL for v4.20? I was just wondering if we should prioritise v4.20 now over v4.19?
I was just curious, if everything was upstream (like the boards that linaro tests for), then running 4.19 should be just the same as 4.20. But if you have big out-of-tree patchsets, that's a totally different story.
Yes testing stable-v4.19/v4.20 is straight forward and will work today. I just need to go through the process of setting it up and requesting this. However, while you were asking, I was curious if you had any idea of the projected EOL for stable-v4.20 yet?
Sorry, the EOL for 4.20 will be once 5.0 is out, usually around the 5.0.3 timeframe or such, like any other "normal" stable kernel lifecycle.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 22:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.94-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 4.14.94-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.14.y git commit: ec31b1a0fd7d9092bbfbef8aed2819dcb899ebac git describe: v4.14.93-28-gec31b1a0fd7d Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.14-oe/build/v4.14.93-28...
No regressions (compared to build v4.14.93)
No fixes (compared to build v4.14.93)
Ran 21651 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - arm64 - hi6220-hikey - arm64 - i386 - juno-r2 - arm64 - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - x15 - arm - x86_64
Test Suites ----------- * boot * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * kselftest * libhugetlbfs * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-timers-tests * spectre-meltdown-checker-test * ltp-open-posix-tests * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:35:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.94 release. There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jan 17 15:48:28 UTC 2019. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 172 pass: 172 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 328 pass: 328 fail: 0
Guenter
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
shuah