This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.92-rc1
Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de staging: greybus: fix stack size warning with UBSAN
Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org drm/i915: Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning in snb_wm_latency_quirk()
Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org staging: wlan-ng: Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning in hfa384x_usb_throttlefn()
Ricardo Ribalda ribalda@chromium.org media: Revert "media: uvcvideo: Set unique vdev name based in type"
Dominik Brodowski linux@dominikbrodowski.net random: fix crash on multiple early calls to add_bootloader_randomness()
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com random: fix data race on crng init time
Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com random: fix data race on crng_node_pool
Brian Silverman brian.silverman@bluerivertech.com can: gs_usb: gs_can_start_xmit(): zero-initialize hf->{flags,reserved}
Marc Kleine-Budde mkl@pengutronix.de can: isotp: convert struct tpcon::{idx,len} to unsigned int
Marc Kleine-Budde mkl@pengutronix.de can: gs_usb: fix use of uninitialized variable, detach device on reception of invalid USB data
Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com mfd: intel-lpss: Fix too early PM enablement in the ACPI ->probe()
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net veth: Do not record rx queue hint in veth_xmit
Adrian Hunter adrian.hunter@intel.com mmc: sdhci-pci: Add PCI ID for Intel ADL
Sven Eckelmann sven@narfation.org ath11k: Fix buffer overflow when scanning with extraie
Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu USB: Fix "slab-out-of-bounds Write" bug in usb_hcd_poll_rh_status
Alan Stern stern@rowland.harvard.edu USB: core: Fix bug in resuming hub's handling of wakeup requests
Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net ARM: dts: exynos: Fix BCM4330 Bluetooth reset polarity in I9100
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org Bluetooth: bfusb: fix division by zero in send path
Aaron Ma aaron.ma@canonical.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for Foxconn QCA 0xe0d0
Aaron Ma aaron.ma@canonical.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add support for Foxconn MT7922A
Zijun Hu quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add two more Bluetooth parts for WCN6855
Mark-YW.Chen mark-yw.chen@mediatek.com Bluetooth: btusb: fix memory leak in btusb_mtk_submit_wmt_recv_urb()
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Fix out of bounds access from invalid *_or_null type verification
Frederic Weisbecker frederic@kernel.org workqueue: Fix unbind_workers() VS wq_worker_running() race
Guoqing Jiang jgq516@gmail.com md: revert io stats accounting
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts | 2 +- drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c | 3 + drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 22 ++++++ drivers/char/random.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 +- drivers/md/md.c | 57 ++++----------- drivers/md/md.h | 1 - drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 7 +- drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 7 +- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 1 + drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h | 1 + drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c | 5 +- drivers/net/veth.c | 1 - drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/wmi.c | 6 +- drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c | 92 ++++++++++++------------ drivers/staging/wlan-ng/hfa384x_usb.c | 22 +++--- drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 9 ++- drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 +- kernel/workqueue.c | 9 +++ net/can/isotp.c | 4 +- 22 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 177 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any new kernel problems here (gcc 8 gmp.h problem remains):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:16:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.92-rc1-gfe11f2e0d63b Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 09:16:08 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
5.10.92-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen foxhlchen@gmail.com
On 1/14/22 12:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 1/14/22 1:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 13:48, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.92-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.92-rc1 * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: fe11f2e0d63baa47c1e36b02721b4fd7a1157955 * git describe: v5.10.91-26-gfe11f2e0d63b * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.91) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.91) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.91) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.91) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary total: 94616, pass: 81315, fail: 544, skip: 11939, xfail: 818
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 259 total, 255 passed, 4 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * i386: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * mips: 34 total, 30 passed, 4 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 52 total, 46 passed, 6 failed * riscv: 24 total, 22 passed, 2 failed * s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-bpf * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/626 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/628
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 470 pass: 470 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter