This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.10-rc1
Michael Hennerich michael.hennerich@analog.com spi: cadence: cache reference clock rate during probe
Christophe Leroy christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu spi: fsl: Fix driver breakage when SPI_CS_HIGH is not set in spi->mode
Ayush Sawal ayush.sawal@chelsio.com cxgb4/chtls: Fix tid stuck due to wrong update of qid
Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com net: dsa: unbind all switches from tree when DSA master unbinds
Lorenzo Bianconi lorenzo@kernel.org mac80211: check if atf has been disabled in __ieee80211_schedule_txq
Felix Fietkau nbd@nbd.name mac80211: do not drop tx nulldata packets on encrypted links
Antonio Borneo antonio.borneo@st.com drm/panel: otm8009a: allow using non-continuous dsi clock
Qinglang Miao miaoqinglang@huawei.com can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_handle_rxif_one(): fix wrong NULL pointer check
Seb Laveze sebastien.laveze@nxp.com net: stmmac: use __napi_schedule() for PREEMPT_RT
David Howells dhowells@redhat.com rxrpc: Fix handling of an unsupported token type in rxrpc_read()
Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com net: dsa: clear devlink port type before unregistering slave netdevs
Marco Felsch m.felsch@pengutronix.de net: phy: smsc: fix clk error handling
Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be dt-bindings: net: renesas,etheravb: RZ/G2H needs tx-internal-delay-ps
Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs
Yannick Vignon yannick.vignon@nxp.com net: stmmac: fix taprio configuration when base_time is in the past
Yannick Vignon yannick.vignon@nxp.com net: stmmac: fix taprio schedule configuration
Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org net: sit: unregister_netdevice on newlink's error path
David Wu david.wu@rock-chips.com net: stmmac: Fixed mtu channged by cache aligned
Cristian Dumitrescu cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com i40e: fix potential NULL pointer dereferencing
Baptiste Lepers baptiste.lepers@gmail.com rxrpc: Call state should be read with READ_ONCE() under some circumstances
Petr Machata petrm@nvidia.com net: dcb: Accept RTM_GETDCB messages carrying set-like DCB commands
Petr Machata me@pmachata.org net: dcb: Validate netlink message in DCB handler
Willem de Bruijn willemb@google.com esp: avoid unneeded kmap_atomic call
Andrey Zhizhikin andrey.zhizhikin@leica-geosystems.com rndis_host: set proper input size for OID_GEN_PHYSICAL_MEDIUM request
Stefan Chulski stefanc@marvell.com net: mvpp2: Remove Pause and Asym_Pause support
Vadim Pasternak vadimp@nvidia.com mlxsw: core: Increase critical threshold for ASIC thermal zone
Vadim Pasternak vadimp@nvidia.com mlxsw: core: Add validation of transceiver temperature thresholds
Hoang Le hoang.h.le@dektech.com.au tipc: fix NULL deref in tipc_link_xmit()
Aya Levin ayal@nvidia.com net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing
Manish Chopra manishc@marvell.com netxen_nic: fix MSI/MSI-x interrupts
Baptiste Lepers baptiste.lepers@gmail.com udp: Prevent reuseport_select_sock from reading uninitialized socks
Dongseok Yi dseok.yi@samsung.com net: fix use-after-free when UDP GRO with shared fraglist
Stephan Gerhold stephan@gerhold.net net: ipa: modem: add missing SET_NETDEV_DEV() for proper sysfs links
Mircea Cirjaliu mcirjaliu@bitdefender.com bpf: Fix helper bpf_map_peek_elem_proto pointing to wrong callback
Gilad Reti gilad.reti@gmail.com bpf: Support PTR_TO_MEM{,_OR_NULL} register spilling
Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com bpf: Don't leak memory in bpf getsockopt when optlen == 0
J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com nfsd4: readdirplus shouldn't return parent of export
Tianjia Zhang tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com X.509: Fix crash caused by NULL pointer
Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net bpf: Fix signed_{sub,add32}_overflows type handling
Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com drm/amdgpu/display: drop DCN support for aarch64
Dexuan Cui decui@microsoft.com x86/hyperv: Initialize clockevents after LAPIC is initialized
Andrei Matei andreimatei1@gmail.com bpf: Fix selftest compilation on clang 11
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Revert "kconfig: remove 'kvmconfig' and 'xenconfig' shorthands"
-------------
Diffstat:
.../devicetree/bindings/net/renesas,etheravb.yaml | 1 + Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 29 +++++++- crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/Makefile | 7 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/Makefile | 7 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/Makefile | 7 -- .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn10/dcn10_resource.c | 81 +++++++++------------- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn20/Makefile | 4 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn21/Makefile | 4 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile | 13 ---- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dsc/Makefile | 5 -- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/os_types.h | 4 -- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-orisetech-otm8009a.c | 2 +- drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-core.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/t4_tcb.h | 7 ++ .../ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls.h | 4 ++ .../chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_cm.c | 32 ++++++++- .../chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_hw.c | 41 +++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 2 +- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 2 - drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_thermal.c | 13 ++-- .../net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c | 7 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac5.c | 52 ++------------ drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 7 +- drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c | 20 +++++- drivers/net/ipa/ipa_modem.c | 1 + drivers/net/phy/smsc.c | 3 +- drivers/net/usb/rndis_host.c | 2 +- drivers/spi/spi-cadence.c | 6 +- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c | 5 +- fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c | 7 +- kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 5 +- kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 ++- net/core/skbuff.c | 29 +++++++- net/core/sock_reuseport.c | 2 +- net/dcb/dcbnl.c | 2 + net/dsa/dsa2.c | 4 ++ net/dsa/master.c | 10 +++ net/ipv4/esp4.c | 7 +- net/ipv6/esp6.c | 7 +- net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 41 ++++++++++- net/ipv6/sit.c | 5 +- net/mac80211/tx.c | 4 +- net/rxrpc/input.c | 2 +- net/rxrpc/key.c | 6 +- net/tipc/link.c | 9 ++- scripts/kconfig/Makefile | 10 +++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h | 2 + 51 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 218 deletions(-)
On 1/22/21 7:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 05:24:01PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 1/22/21 7:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Thanks for testing these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.10-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 402284178c914c87fd7b41bc9bd93f2772c43904 git describe: v5.10.9-44-g402284178c91 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.9)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.9)
Ran 55124 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments -------------- - dragonboard-410c - hi6220-hikey - i386 - juno-r2 - juno-r2-compat - juno-r2-kasan - nxp-ls2088 - qemu-arm-clang - qemu-arm64-clang - qemu-arm64-kasan - qemu-i386-clang - qemu-x86_64-clang - qemu-x86_64-kasan - qemu-x86_64-kcsan - qemu_arm - qemu_arm64 - qemu_arm64-compat - qemu_i386 - qemu_x86_64 - qemu_x86_64-compat - x15 - x86 - x86-kasan
Test Suites ----------- * build * igt-gpu-tools * install-android-platform-tools-r2600 * libhugetlbfs * linux-log-parser * ltp-commands-tests * ltp-containers-tests * ltp-cve-tests * ltp-dio-tests * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests * ltp-filecaps-tests * ltp-fs-tests * ltp-fs_bind-tests * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests * ltp-fsx-tests * ltp-hugetlb-tests * ltp-io-tests * ltp-ipc-tests * ltp-math-tests * ltp-mm-tests * ltp-sched-tests * ltp-tracing-tests * fwts * kselftest * ltp-cap_bounds-tests * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests * ltp-crypto-tests * ltp-nptl-tests * ltp-pty-tests * ltp-securebits-tests * ltp-syscalls-tests * network-basic-tests * perf * ltp-controllers-tests * ltp-open-posix-tests * v4l2-compliance * kvm-unit-tests * kunit * rcutorture * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 11:14, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Summary
kernel: 5.10.10-rc1 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-5.10.y git commit: 402284178c914c87fd7b41bc9bd93f2772c43904 git describe: v5.10.9-44-g402284178c91 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.9)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.9)
Ran 55124 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- nxp-ls2088
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
Test Suites
- build
- igt-gpu-tools
- install-android-platform-tools-r2600
- libhugetlbfs
- linux-log-parser
- ltp-commands-tests
- ltp-containers-tests
- ltp-cve-tests
- ltp-dio-tests
- ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
- ltp-filecaps-tests
- ltp-fs-tests
- ltp-fs_bind-tests
- ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
- ltp-fsx-tests
- ltp-hugetlb-tests
- ltp-io-tests
- ltp-ipc-tests
- ltp-math-tests
- ltp-mm-tests
- ltp-sched-tests
- ltp-tracing-tests
- fwts
- kselftest
- ltp-cap_bounds-tests
- ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
- ltp-crypto-tests
- ltp-nptl-tests
- ltp-pty-tests
- ltp-securebits-tests
- ltp-syscalls-tests
- network-basic-tests
- perf
- ltp-controllers-tests
- ltp-open-posix-tests
- v4l2-compliance
- kvm-unit-tests
- kunit
- rcutorture
- kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
- kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 12:50:24PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 11:14, Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:49, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 10:52:45AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Thanks for testing some of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:12:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 64 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.10-rc1-g402284178c91 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 09:59:10AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:12:16 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.10-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 64 tests: 64 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.10-rc1-g402284178c91 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
greg k-h
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:12:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:36:01AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:12:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.10 release. There are 43 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Thanks for testing them all and letting me know.
greg k-h