This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.161-rc1
Rasmus Villemoes linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk net: loopback: use NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE for name_assign_type
Sungwoo Kim iam@sung-woo.kim Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix u8 overflow
José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com HID: uclogic: Add HID_QUIRK_HIDINPUT_FORCE quirk
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com HID: ite: Enable QUIRK_TOUCHPAD_ON_OFF_REPORT on Acer Aspire Switch V 10
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com HID: ite: Enable QUIRK_TOUCHPAD_ON_OFF_REPORT on Acer Aspire Switch 10E
Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com HID: ite: Add support for Acer S1002 keyboard-dock
Ferry Toth ftoth@exalondelft.nl usb: ulpi: defer ulpi_register on ulpi_read_id timeout
Tony Nguyen anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com igb: Initialize mailbox message for VF reset
Reka Norman rekanorman@chromium.org xhci: Apply XHCI_RESET_TO_DEFAULT quirk to ADL-N
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org USB: serial: f81534: fix division by zero on line-speed change
Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org USB: serial: f81232: fix division by zero on line-speed change
Bruno Thomsen bruno.thomsen@gmail.com USB: serial: cp210x: add Kamstrup RF sniffer PIDs
Duke Xin duke_xinanwen@163.com USB: serial: option: add Quectel EM05-G modem
Szymon Heidrich szymon.heidrich@gmail.com usb: gadget: uvc: Prevent buffer overflow in setup handler
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz udf: Fix extending file within last block
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz udf: Do not bother looking for prealloc extents if i_lenExtents matches i_size
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz udf: Fix preallocation discarding at indirect extent boundary
Jan Kara jack@suse.cz udf: Discard preallocation before extending file with a hole
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +- drivers/hid/hid-ids.h | 2 + drivers/hid/hid-ite.c | 26 ++++++++++- drivers/hid/hid-uclogic-core.c | 1 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +- drivers/net/loopback.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c | 5 +- drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 4 +- drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 2 + drivers/usb/serial/f81232.c | 12 +++-- drivers/usb/serial/f81534.c | 12 +++-- drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++ fs/udf/inode.c | 76 ++++++++++++++----------------- fs/udf/truncate.c | 48 ++++++------------- net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 3 +- 16 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi, Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or regressions to report.
Yours, -- Slade
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:36 PM Slade Watkins srw@sladewatkins.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 2:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi, I noticed that the original message was missing my Tested-by...
Compiled and tested on my x86_64 test systems, no errors or regressions to report.
Same applies.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins srw@sladewatkins.net
Sorry, -- Slade (via his corrected script)
On 12/19/22 11:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On 12/19/22 12:24, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 00:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.161-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: bc32b2c55e20a98b04c9ccb34c50e4fbd7f2b8cd * git describe: v5.10.160-19-gbc32b2c55e20 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.10.160)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.160)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.10.160)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.160)
## Test result summary total: 120764, pass: 105386, fail: 2229, skip: 12725, xfail: 424
## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 147 total, 146 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 45 total, 43 passed, 2 failed * i386: 35 total, 33 passed, 2 failed * mips: 27 total, 24 passed, 3 failed * parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 28 total, 23 passed, 5 failed * riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * boot * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func * kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * perf * perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.10.161-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20221127): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2409 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2424
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 06:48:08AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 08:24:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 162 pass: 162 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 475 pass: 475 fail: 0
Also wrong. Sorry.
Guenter
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:24:53 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.161 release. There are 18 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Dec 2022 18:29:31 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.161-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.161-rc1-gbc32b2c55e20 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
-
Florian Fainelli -
Greg Kroah-Hartman -
Guenter Roeck -
Jon Hunter -
Naresh Kamboju -
Pavel Machek -
Rudi Heitbaum -
Shuah Khan -
Slade Watkins -
Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)