On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:32:52PM +0100, Milosz Wasilewski wrote:
> On 27 June 2017 at 13:27, Greg KH <gregkh@google.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:25:27PM +0100, Milosz Wasilewski wrote:
> >> On 27 June 2017 at 13:21, Greg KH <gregkh@google.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:03:01PM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
> >> >> Summary
> >> >>
> >> >>   • Tests: 991
> >> >>   • Failed: 13
> >> >>   • Passed: 978
> >> >>   • Build: next-20170627
> >> >
> >> > linux-next?  Wait, why do we care about that tree here at the moment?
> >> > We have _so_ many other things to worry about first, right?
> >>
> >> It was cheap to add and it produces new build every day. This way it's
> >> easier to sort out the problems with infrastructure we currently have.
> >> Stable branches don't change that frequently.
> >
> > Once a week is not enough?  :)
> >
> > And android-common changes a few times a week, if we should just be
> > ignoring the linux-next testing for now, that's fine, but please let us
> > know that...
> >
>
> I think the easiest would be not to send these emails to lts-dev yet.
> I'll remove them if that's OK

Send stuff here that you want us to either pay attention to, or to let
us know that you all are working on something, and that it's just a
"look, the system is alive!" type of thing.

For the latter, mark it as such so we don't get worried if we see a lot

​​

of failures, like I did here :)