[PATCH v4] Add RISC-V support content to the EBBR specification

Grant Likely grant.likely at arm.com
Mon Jul 5 08:13:54 UTC 2021

On 23/06/2021 07:34, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:54 AM Grant Likely <grant.likely at arm.com> wrote:
> Regarding "UEFI Boot at S mode" section [1], it just tries to
> emphasize that UEFI boot at S-mode is the most common scenario for
> current/near future platforms as
> there are not many platforms with hypervisor extension available right now.
> We can reword something like this as talking about the draft extension
> is not necessary.
> "Most systems are expected to boot UEFI at S mode in absence of
> hypervisor extension."

Here's what I've merged after some editorial work. If this isn't right, 
follow up patches can fix it up.



More information about the boot-architecture mailing list