[PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
law at redhat.com
Tue Apr 10 04:16:34 UTC 2012
On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more "we've been talking about this for
> a long time, so let's just go with XXX" and then people moved on to the next
> topic (which was defining exactly what "hard float abi" meant wrt compiler
> flags). further, it seemed like we had distro representation there, but not
> mainline gcc people.
Actually Mike, there was at least one mainline GCC person there. Me.
Of course I was thrown into a discussion I knew nothing about, but the
goal of having a standardized path to discover ld.so which worked across
distros seems like goodness to me. Honestly, I don't see what all the
resistance is about.
More information about the cross-distro