Yet another memory provider: can linaro organize a meeting?

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Mar 22 10:03:50 UTC 2011


On Monday 21 March 2011 19:03:38 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 09:14:54 Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > Rough schedules.
> > 
> > 1. Warsaw meetings (3/16~3/18): mostly v4l2 person and some SoC vendors
> > 
> >   Make a consensence at media developers. and share the information.
> >   Please note that it's v4l2 brainstorming meeting. so memory management
> >   is not the main issue.
> 
> I have asked all participants to the meeting to try and assemble
> requirements for their hardware in the next week.
> 
> > 2. ELC (4/11~4/13): DRM, DRI and v4l2 person.
> > 
> >   Discuss GEM/TTM is acceptable for non-X86 system and find out the which
> >   modules are acceptable.
> >   We studied the GEM for our environment. but it's too huge and not much
> >   benefit for us since current frameworks are enough.
> >   The missing is that no generic memory passing mechanism. We need the
> >   generic memory passing interface. that's all.
> 
> Who will be there? Is there a BoF or something similar organized?
> 
> > 3. Linaro (5/9~5/13): ARM, SoC vendors and v4l2 persons.
> > 
> >   I hope several person are anticipated and made a small step for final
> >   goal.
> 
> I should be able to join, at least for the part related to buffer pools and
> related topics.

Same for me. I might not join for the whole week, so it would be nice if we 
could draft an agenda in the near future.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



More information about the linaro-dev mailing list