[PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators

Cousson, Benoit b-cousson at ti.com
Mon Feb 27 22:24:14 UTC 2012

On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson at ti.com>  wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
>> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
>> Grant...
> If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
> yours.  That tree is stable now for exactly that reason.  You can rely
> on it.

I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series 
into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.


[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65346.html

More information about the linaro-dev mailing list