Plan for changing the binary toolchain to 4.7 and hardfloat

David Rusling david.rusling at linaro.org
Mon Mar 19 10:18:48 UTC 2012


Michael,
	me too.    Can you talk to Steve McKintyre and Konstantinos about this?    We've spent the last 12 months trying to get alignment / agreement across all of the distributions on this.    arm-linux-gnueabihf is the least worst, agreed option.
Dave

On 19 Mar 2012, at 08:48, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:27:17 +0000
> Mans Rullgard <mans.rullgard at linaro.org> wrote:
>> FWIW, Gentoo has been using arm-hardfloat-linux-gnueabi for hardfloat
>> configurations ever since gcc started supporting it.  That's of course
>> not a triplet, strictly speaking.
> 
> Also fwiw, I have been assured from Gentoo developers that they will change their triplet to arm-linux-gnueabihf as soon as upstream adopts it.
> 
> I find the situation sad as well, since Linaro has been pushing for this triplet (at least the OCTO team and me personally for more than a year), and not having full support from within Linaro with regards to this matter is quite depressing. And I have to say, especially one of the arguments (Windows storage issue) should be irrelevant for a Linux problem.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Konstantinos
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/attachments/20120319/8adbad9f/attachment.html>


More information about the linaro-dev mailing list