Hello,
There were increasing Android build times during last month again
(going over 3.5hrs). Yesterday, I re-created the seed, but that didn't
improve times match. I did more stats on builds and it turns out that
we spend almost 1.5hrs in copying ever-growing overlay collection to
the slaves via sluggish CopyToSlave Jenkins plugin.
That's issues known for at least half-year, and was in queue for being
reworked. I didn't work on android-build closely for few months, but
now that I'm back on maintenance, I'd like to start with fixing this
long-overdue issue.
The idea was to pull all the needed overlay, straight to a slave. The
complication here was handling of license protected files.
ci.linaro.org had the same issue, and used a script to handle
automatic downloads for some time. However, as of now, it was switched
to other process and the script git bitrotted with recent
linaro-license-protection codebase changes. I took a look at revamping
it, but then though that it may be a good idea to use simpler and
more explicit process, following closely click-thru usage. So, if you
want to use a license-protected binaries in a build, you'd need to
specify:
ACCEPT_LICENSE=<license_id>
Where <license_id> is id under which license is registered in
linaro-license-protection. One good way to figure it out is to read the
license page at all (well, as HTML source, the id is included in some
links). Wording of variable name (as well as of commands in underlying
implementation) is also explicit to point that its usage construes
license acceptance.
I prototypes these changes using
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~pfalcon/panda-jb-gcc47-tilt-tracki…
which is down to 2h10m build time. I'm ready to migrate all builds
tomorrow, while we're early in cycle start.
Please let me know if there're any issues with approach or proposed
migration timeframe, otherwise let's make android-build rock again.
Thanks,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
+ Linaro Android Mailing List
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Botao Sun <botao.sun(a)linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Vishal,
>
> Do you think we need a bug in Launchpad to track this issue?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Botao Sun
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Soumya Basak <soumya.basak(a)linaro.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Botao,
>> I have checked twice the image with panda 4460 board:
>>
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>
>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>
>> 1. basically, when eth0 cable is plugged in hw, and wifi is not turned on
>> from UI,
>> # busybox ifconfig -a not shown the wlan0
>> only eth0 up and accessing network.
>> 2. when you turn on wifi it will ask you password, after assign password,
>> wifi shown connected (but inactive),
>> # busybox ifconfig -a shown the wlan0 candidate but no inet address,
>> and mask.
>> 3. when unplugged the eth0, wlan0 is get inet address and musk, and
>> connected.
>>
>> on the other hand wifi is working well, there is no issue with Youtube
>> playback, or enable from UI, after assign Password.
>>
>> so, both are not up at the same time.
>>
>> this stuff is observed from since Android version: 4.3
>>
>> @Botao, what is your opinion ?
>>
>> Thank You.
>> Best Regards
>> Soumya Basak.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 November 2013 20:40, Botao Sun <botao.sun(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> OK, with more tests, the problem is, if no Ethernet cable attached, WiFi
>>> works, otherwise, it shows the error I mentioned in previous 2 emails.
>>>
>>> root@pandaboard:/ # busybox ifconfig -a
>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0E:60:CF:E5:49:01
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1488 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:14 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:2510 (2.4 KiB)
>>>
>>> ip6tnl0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
>>> 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>> NOARP MTU:1452 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>
>>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>
>>> sit0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
>>> 00-00-00-00-0F-00-01-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>> NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>
>>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0E:20:CF:E5:49:01
>>> inet addr:10.0.0.25 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:105 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>> RX bytes:97780 (95.4 KiB) TX bytes:14813 (14.4 KiB)
>>>
>>> root@pandaboard:/ #
>>>
>>> Is it a "work-as-design" stuff or a bug? If we keep it likes this, then
>>> in order to test WiFi, I have to disable Ethernet first, then restore it
>>> after the test is done.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Botao Sun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Botao Sun <botao.sun(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Soumya,
>>>>
>>>> The WiFi doesn't work on 13.10 release image either:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-lin…
>>>>
>>>> On my TI Panda 4460 board, same behaviour observed, and following
>>>> output shows:
>>>>
>>>> [ 148.630249] wl1271: loaded
>>>> [ 149.538604] wl1271: firmware booted (Rev 6.3.0.0.77)
>>>> [ 149.556671] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>>>> [ 250.320129] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
>>>> [ 250.383636] wl1271: Association completed.
>>>> [ 251.542541] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
>>>> [ 261.064025] wl1271: Scan completed due to error.
>>>> [ 261.069000] wl1271: Reading FW panic log
>>>> [ 261.074127] wl1271: Hardware recovery in progress. FW ver: Rev
>>>> 6.3.0.0.77 pc: 0x0
>>>> [ 261.074127] wl1271: down
>>>> [ 261.086059] ieee80211 phy0: Hardware restart was requested
>>>> [ 261.714691] wl1271: firmware booted (Rev 6.3.0.0.77)
>>>>
>>>> Would you double check it on your side? Based on the output of
>>>> "ifconfig", there is no IP assigned to wlan0 interface:
>>>>
>>>> root@pandaboard:/ # busybox ifconfig -a
>>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0E:60:CF:E5:49:01
>>>> inet addr:10.0.0.24 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1488 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:34 errors:0 dropped:2 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>> TX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>>> RX bytes:3870 (3.7 KiB) TX bytes:1901 (1.8 KiB)
>>>>
>>>> ip6tnl0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
>>>> 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>>> NOARP MTU:1452 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>>
>>>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>>>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>>>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>>
>>>> sit0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
>>>> 00-00-00-00-0F-00-01-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>>>> NOARP MTU:1480 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>>>
>>>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 0E:20:CF:E5:49:01
>>>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>>> RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>>> TX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>>> RX bytes:607 (607.0 B) TX bytes:655 (655.0 B)
>>>>
>>>> root@pandaboard:/ #
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Botao Sun
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Botao Sun <botao.sun(a)linaro.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Soumya,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please take a look at WiFi status on TI Panda 4460, with Linaro
>>>>> Android build 479:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>>>>
>>>>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>>>>
>>>>> http://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-member-ti/panda-linaro/…
>>>>>
>>>>> You can use "wget" to download them in your local terminal if the web
>>>>> page can't be shown up.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ask because I just found WiFi doesn't work via GUI on my side,
>>>>> following log shows in serial console:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 25.692474] wl1271: loaded
>>>>> [ 26.373870] smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0: eth0: link up, 100Mbps,
>>>>> full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
>>>>> [ 27.608551] wl1271: firmware booted (Rev 6.3.0.0.77)
>>>>> [ 27.629058] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
>>>>> [ 29.750000] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
>>>>> [ 29.803771] wl1271: Association completed.
>>>>> [ 29.951232] init: sys_prop: permission denied uid:1003
>>>>> name:service.bootanim.exit
>>>>> [ 30.969970] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
>>>>>
>>>>> The access point can be shown successfully in the list, and I can
>>>>> click and enter password as well, but then above output shows, with
>>>>> "Disabled" under the access point name on my screen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on our test result spreadsheet, it should at least work on 13.10
>>>>> release image. I'm going to try it soon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>> Botao Sun
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Hello everyone:
I am new for this part. Today I tried to build Android to Pandaboard (Linaro 12.04). When I did the last step ¨Get Binaries¨, the text can be seen below. I do not know why. Could you give some advices?
Best regards
Ryan
Hi,
I am new to kernel compiling.
I just compiled and boot my Nexus 4/Mako using Google Toolchain, and now I
want to try Linaro.
I look at the https://android-build.linaro.org/ page but can't find for
Mako.
Any tips?
Thanks.
Jon,
I think I have solved issue. I replaced the motherboard USBMS contents with files from V5.0 VE DVD, and issue went away.
Thanks
Eric H
________________________________
From: Eric Huang
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:05 PM
To: 'Jon Medhurst (Tixy)'; linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org
Subject: Failure to boot with 13.10
Jon,
I tried to update my Vexpress TC2 to 13.10, but bootup seems to stuck at "Running boot script from flash BOOTSCRIPT". This is the first time I tried to switch to use UEFI with zImage. I updated the firmware of my VExpress following the steps listed in the release note. Any idea what I did wrong?
Cmd>
Powering up system...
Daughterboard fitted to site 1.
Switching on ATXPSU...
ATX3V3: ON
VIOset: 1.8V
MBtemp: 37 degC
Configuring motherboard (rev D, var A)...
IOFPGA config: PASSED
MUXFPGA config: PASSED
OSC CLK config: PASSED
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\zimage.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image zimage
Image: zimage UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\zimage.bin
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\dtb.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image dtb
Image: dtb UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\dtb.bin
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\initrd.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image initrd
Image: initrd UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\initrd.bin
Testing SMC devices (FPGA build 16)...
SRAM 32MB test: PASSED
VRAM 8MB test: PASSED
LAN9118 test: PASSED
USB & OTG test: PASSED
KMI1/KMI2 test: PASSED
MMC & SD test: PASSED
DVI image test: PASSED
AACI AC97 test: PASSED
CF card test: PASSED
UART port test: PASSED
MAC addrs test: PASSED
Reading Site 1 Board File \SITE1\HBI0249A\board.txt
DB1 JTAG configuration complete.
Setting DB1 OSCCLKS...
DB1.0 DCC 0 SPI configuration complete.
Writing SCC 0x40610007 with 0xFF00FF00
Writing SCC 0x40610046 with 0x01CD1011
Writing SCC 0x406101C0 with 0x1032F003
Writing SCC 0x40610100 with 0x33330C00
Writing SCC 0x40610048 with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x40610049 with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004A with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004B with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004C with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004D with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004E with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004F with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x40610300 with 0x00000005
Writing SCC 0x40610301 with 0x060E0356
Writing SCC 0x40610302 with 0x00000000
Writing SCC 0x40610303 with 0x00000000
Writing SCC 0x40610304 with 0x384061A8
Writing SCC 0x40610305 with 0x38407530
Writing SCC 0x40610306 with 0x384088B8
Writing SCC 0x40610307 with 0x38409C40
Writing SCC 0x40610308 with 0x3840AFC8
Writing SCC 0x40610309 with 0x3840C350
Writing SCC 0x4061030A with 0x3CF0D6D8
Writing SCC 0x4061030B with 0x41A0EA60
Writing SCC 0x4061030C with 0x3840445C
Writing SCC 0x4061030D with 0x38404E20
Writing SCC 0x4061030E with 0x384061A8
Writing SCC 0x4061030F with 0x38407530
Writing SCC 0x40610310 with 0x384088B8
Writing SCC 0x40610311 with 0x38409C40
Writing SCC 0x40610312 with 0x3CF0AFC8
Writing SCC 0x40610313 with 0x41A0C350
DB1.0 DCC 0 SCC configuration complete.
DB SMB clock enabled.
Waiting for SITE1 CB_READY...
Testing SMB clock...
Configuring MUXFPGA for MB.
Setting DVI mode for VGA.
Releasing Daughterboard resets.
Switching MCC log to UART1.
%BootMonitor-Warning, Unable to open SYSTEM.DAT
ARM Versatile Express Boot Monitor
Version: V5.1.9
Build Date: Dec 3 2012
Daughterboard Site 1: V2P-CA15_A7 Cortex A7
Daughterboard Site 2: Not Used
Running boot script from flash - BOOTSCRIPT
Jon,
I tried to update my Vexpress TC2 to 13.10, but bootup seems to stuck at "Running boot script from flash BOOTSCRIPT". This is the first time I tried to switch to use UEFI with zImage. I updated the firmware of my VExpress following the steps listed in the release note. Any idea what I did wrong?
Cmd>
Powering up system...
Daughterboard fitted to site 1.
Switching on ATXPSU...
ATX3V3: ON
VIOset: 1.8V
MBtemp: 37 degC
Configuring motherboard (rev D, var A)...
IOFPGA config: PASSED
MUXFPGA config: PASSED
OSC CLK config: PASSED
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\zimage.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image zimage
Image: zimage UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\zimage.bin
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\dtb.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image dtb
Image: dtb UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\dtb.bin
Programming image \SOFTWARE\TC2\initrd.bin
Erasing Flash
.
Writing Flash
Updating eeprom with image initrd
Image: initrd UPDATED from \SOFTWARE\TC2\initrd.bin
Testing SMC devices (FPGA build 16)...
SRAM 32MB test: PASSED
VRAM 8MB test: PASSED
LAN9118 test: PASSED
USB & OTG test: PASSED
KMI1/KMI2 test: PASSED
MMC & SD test: PASSED
DVI image test: PASSED
AACI AC97 test: PASSED
CF card test: PASSED
UART port test: PASSED
MAC addrs test: PASSED
Reading Site 1 Board File \SITE1\HBI0249A\board.txt
DB1 JTAG configuration complete.
Setting DB1 OSCCLKS...
DB1.0 DCC 0 SPI configuration complete.
Writing SCC 0x40610007 with 0xFF00FF00
Writing SCC 0x40610046 with 0x01CD1011
Writing SCC 0x406101C0 with 0x1032F003
Writing SCC 0x40610100 with 0x33330C00
Writing SCC 0x40610048 with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x40610049 with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004A with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004B with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004C with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004D with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x4061004E with 0x022F1010
Writing SCC 0x4061004F with 0x0011710D
Writing SCC 0x40610300 with 0x00000005
Writing SCC 0x40610301 with 0x060E0356
Writing SCC 0x40610302 with 0x00000000
Writing SCC 0x40610303 with 0x00000000
Writing SCC 0x40610304 with 0x384061A8
Writing SCC 0x40610305 with 0x38407530
Writing SCC 0x40610306 with 0x384088B8
Writing SCC 0x40610307 with 0x38409C40
Writing SCC 0x40610308 with 0x3840AFC8
Writing SCC 0x40610309 with 0x3840C350
Writing SCC 0x4061030A with 0x3CF0D6D8
Writing SCC 0x4061030B with 0x41A0EA60
Writing SCC 0x4061030C with 0x3840445C
Writing SCC 0x4061030D with 0x38404E20
Writing SCC 0x4061030E with 0x384061A8
Writing SCC 0x4061030F with 0x38407530
Writing SCC 0x40610310 with 0x384088B8
Writing SCC 0x40610311 with 0x38409C40
Writing SCC 0x40610312 with 0x3CF0AFC8
Writing SCC 0x40610313 with 0x41A0C350
DB1.0 DCC 0 SCC configuration complete.
DB SMB clock enabled.
Waiting for SITE1 CB_READY...
Testing SMB clock...
Configuring MUXFPGA for MB.
Setting DVI mode for VGA.
Releasing Daughterboard resets.
Switching MCC log to UART1.
%BootMonitor-Warning, Unable to open SYSTEM.DAT
ARM Versatile Express Boot Monitor
Version: V5.1.9
Build Date: Dec 3 2012
Daughterboard Site 1: V2P-CA15_A7 Cortex A7
Daughterboard Site 2: Not Used
Running boot script from flash - BOOTSCRIPT
Hello,
I am a newbie on linaro andrioid project. Hope this is the place where I
can ask questions.
When I build the android for pandaboard, I dont know which manifest.xml
should be used, as I don understand the purpose of this file. Is there any
place decribing this file?
Also, what is overlay file used for and when should we use it in bulding
the android?
Thanks.
--
Alex,
*Dreams can come true – just believe.*
Can anyone provide clues to help me get 'sdcard' partition working on
Linaro Android KitKat images? Here's where I've got to so far...
After updating the vexpress storage config for KitKat [1] the sdcard
partition on Linaro Android images is getting mounted by vold, but apps
can't access this because android.process.media keeps crashing in
attachVolume because FileUtils.getFatVolumeId is returning -1.
With MediaProvider hacked to provide verbose logging I get:
V/MediaProvider( 2825): /storage/sdcard0 volume ID: -1
E/MediaProvider( 2825): Can't obtain external volume ID even though it's mounted.
and I've verified the -1 comes from the call ioctl(fd,
VFAT_IOCTL_GET_VOLUME_ID) in android_os_FileUtils_getFatVolumeId in
frameworks/base/core/jni/android_os_FileUtils.cpp.
Running 'mount' gives...
rootfs / rootfs rw,relatime 0 0
tmpfs /dev tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,relatime,mode=600 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/secure tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=700 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/asec tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755,gid=1000 0 0
tmpfs /mnt/obb tmpfs rw,relatime,mode=755,gid=1000 0 0
/sys/kernel/debug /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,relatime 0 0
/dev/block/sda2 /system ext4 ro,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/sda3 /cache ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,errors=panic,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/block/sda5 /data ext4 rw,nosuid,nodev,noatime,errors=panic,data=ordered 0 0
nodev /dev/gator gatorfs rw,relatime 0 0
/dev/block/vold/8:6 /mnt/media_rw/sdcard0 vfat rw,dirsync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,uid=1023,gid=1023,fmask=0007,dmask=0007,allow_utime=0020,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro 0 0
/dev/block/vold/8:6 /mnt/secure/asec vfat rw,dirsync,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,uid=1023,gid=1023,fmask=0007,dmask=0007,allow_utime=0020,codepage=437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,utf8,errors=remount-ro 0 0
/dev/fuse /storage/sdcard0 fuse rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=1023,group_id=1023,default_permissions,allow_other 0 0
So first guess would be that fuse doesn't support this function, however
as this seems to be the standard Android way of doing things, you would
assume that it should work...?
[1] http://review.android.git.linaro.org/#/c/4563/2
--
Tixy