Aye. :) Good catch.
On 30 January 2012 14:37, Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org wrote:
I'm all for it as long as snowball gets named 'ics-igloo-stable-gcc46-snwoball' rather than 'ics-igloo-stable-gcc46-panda'.
Mathieu.
On 12-01-30 12:24 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
So our current naming scheme is awful.
staging- landing- tracking-
ick ick ick
We'd like to make this better, here's the idea:
old new
staging-vexpress-a9 ics-armlt-stable-gcc46-vexpress-a9
tracking-panda ics-tilt-tracking-gcc46-panda
aosp-panda ics-aosp-stable-gcc44-panda
staging-imx53 ics-freescalelt-stable-gcc46-imx53
panda-4.4 ics-tilt-upstream-gcc46-panda
landing-snowball ics-igloo-stable-gcc46-panda
landing-panda ics-omapzoom-stable-gcc46-panda, keep
staging-panda ics-tilt-stable-gcc46-panda
staging-origen ics-samsunglt-stable-gcc46-origen
panda ics-kwg-upstream-gcc46-panda
panda-4.4 ics-aosp-stable-gcc44-panda
Its basically,
<type of Android>-<kernel source>-<kernel type>-<toolchain version>-<target>
Hopefully this will allow people to figure out what's what.
Comments, questions, concerns?
linaro-android mailing list linaro-android@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android