On 9 May 2012 00:15, Paul Larson paul.larson@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfeffer@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 May 2012 18:57, Paul Larson paul.larson@linaro.org wrote:
That's one possibility, but is 3 enough? We could get into a game where 3, 10, 100 is never enough to catch the problem. The other obvious thing that jumps out at me here is that reboot and shutdown are tested on the ubuntu side, but not on android. If we covered both of those, we would already have multiple boots covered. I would be ok with 3 boots as a reasonable number, but I think it would be even better if we added it implicitly by adding reboot and halt as tests.
Its a start for a manual test. I think the 100 reboots that Alexander mentions in LAVA is also good. If you;re plus one would you add it to the Android test wiki?
Adding what, the 3 boots instead of single boot, or the boot + reboot + halt and boot as I described (which would still be 3 boots, but would also cover additional cases that are currently not covered).
Yeah. So the boot test is:
Repeat 3 times: Boot to UI Shutdown