On 9 April 2012 06:01, Kejun Zhou kejun.zhou@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Rob, Would you tell me the CPUIDLE test steps in pm-qa?
As the pm-qa needs to run in bash, and use the "make" tool, but the Android only has its own shell, the "make" tool is not available in Android system.
Why is pm-qa running make? Is it just to load the system?
Thank a lot.
Hi Zach, The limitation of Android system(bash and make) blocks the CPUIDLE too much.
Kejun, if make is just being used to make the system busy, we have other tools for that. Talk to Amit about some of the commands he integrated for big.LITTLE testing.
BRs, Kejun
On 7 April 2012 03:18, Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Kejun,
Regarding your two questions below:
- Guess the questions on CPUIDLE implementation will be much better
answered by Rob Lee (Cc-ed). 2. The PM WG has tests for their features:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#Cpuidle
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/QA/Scripts#Pre-req...
Thanks, Andrey
On 04/06/2012 01:29 PM, Kejun Zhou wrote:
Hi Andrey,
I am Kejun from Linaro Android team. I got a task to integrate the CPUIDLE to Linaro Android kernel branch from Zach.
I found the CPUIDLE is included in linux-linaro-3.3-2012.03-2 from your email, and merged Snowball CPUIDLE to linaro-android-12.03-release kernel.
I have some questions about how to verify whether this CPUIDLE feature is integrated or not.
- I found that the cpu_do_idle() is executed. But the code in "if () "
won't be executed after Android starting up. And the current is between 380mA ~ 490mA, I thinks when CPUIDLE is working, the current should be more low than 380mA.
static inline int ux500_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index) {
.. if (atomic_inc_return(&master) == num_online_cpus()) {
.. }
wfi: cpu_do_idle()
... }
- Is there some method to test the CPUIDLE feature from the Linux
console?
Thanks a lot.
BRs, Kejun.
On 28 March 2012 04:11, Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@linaro.org mailto:andrey.konovalov@linaro.org> wrote:
Greetings,
The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) and the Linaro Platform Group are excited to announce the availability our March 2012 development snapshot:
linux-linaro-3.3-2012.03-2
As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels and have not been fully validated. You should expect issues and to help us deliver a better kernel in the future, please file bugs in Launchpad at https://bugs.launchpad.net/__linux-linaro https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro.
The source tarball is available at:
https://launchpad.net/linux-__linaro/devtrack/12.03/+__download/linux-linaro...
https://launchpad.net/linux-linaro/devtrack/12.03/+download/linux-linaro-3.3-2012.03-2.tar.bz2
The kernel sources can also be accessed using git at: git://git.linaro.org/kernel/__linux-linaro-tracking.git http://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git
tag: linux-linaro-3.3-2012.03-2
This kernel includes the following changes from the 2012.02 kernel:
- Update to 3.3
- Various patches from Linaro * Versatile Express patches from ARM LT * Gator module for ARM's Streamline Performance Ananlyzer from ARM LT * updated irq_domain patch set from Grant L. * cpuidle core consolidation, cpuidle support for i.MX5/6 and ST-E u8500 from PM WG * updated patch set support for common save and restore code to the Samsung exynos platform from PM WG * updated thermal_cpu_cooling patch set from the power management WG * UFS patches from kernel WG * eMMC4.5 patches from kernel WG * initial dma-buf patch set and some related components for UMM
- AOSP 3.3 android patch set
A full change log against the 3.3 release is available at: https://launchpad.net/linux-__linaro/devtrack/12.03
https://launchpad.net/linux-linaro/devtrack/12.03
High Priority Known Issues:
- ANDROID_RAM_CONSOLE must be disabled for the android kernel to boot.
_________________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org mailto:linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/__mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev