Hi Volodymyr,
On 8/23/19 7:48 PM, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
There is a case possible, when OP-TEE asks guest to allocate shared buffer, but Xen for some reason can't translate buffer's addresses. In this situation we should do two things:
- Tell guest to free allocated buffer, so there will be no memory
 leak for guest.
- Tell OP-TEE that buffer allocation failed.
 To ask guest to free allocated buffer we should perform the same thing, as OP-TEE does - issue RPC request. This is done by filling request buffer (luckily we can reuse the same buffer, that OP-TEE used to issue original request) and then return to guest with special return code.
Then we need to handle next call from guest in a special way: as RPC was issued by Xen, not by OP-TEE, it should be handled by Xen. Basically, this is the mechanism to preempt OP-TEE mediator.
The same mechanism can be used in the future to preempt mediator during translation large (>512 pages) shared buffers.
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com
xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c index 3ce6e7fa55..4eebc60b62 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/optee.c @@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_UNREGISTERED_SHM | \ OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_DYNAMIC_SHM) +enum optee_call_state {
- OPTEEM_CALL_NORMAL = 0,
 
enum always start counting at 0. Also, looking at the code, it does not seem you need to know the value. Right?
- OPTEEM_CALL_XEN_RPC,
 
I am a bit confused, the enum is called optee_call_state but all the enum are prefixed with OPTEEM_CALL_. Why the discrepancy?
+};
- static unsigned int __read_mostly max_optee_threads;
 /* @@ -112,6 +117,9 @@ struct optee_std_call { paddr_t guest_arg_ipa; int optee_thread_id; int rpc_op;
- /* Saved buffer type for the last buffer allocate request */
 
Looking at the code, it feels to me you are saving the buffer type for the current command and not the last. Did I miss anything?
- unsigned int rpc_buffer_type;
 - enum optee_call_state state; uint64_t rpc_data_cookie; bool in_flight; register_t rpc_params[2];
 @@ -299,6 +307,7 @@ static struct optee_std_call *allocate_std_call(struct optee_domain *ctx) call->optee_thread_id = -1; call->in_flight = true;
- call->state = OPTEEM_CALL_NORMAL;
 spin_lock(&ctx->lock); list_add_tail(&call->list, &ctx->call_list); @@ -1075,6 +1084,10 @@ static int handle_rpc_return(struct optee_domain *ctx, ret = -ERESTART; }
/* Save the buffer type in case we will want to free it */if ( shm_rpc->xen_arg->cmd == OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC )call->rpc_buffer_type = shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.a;unmap_domain_page(shm_rpc->xen_arg); }@@ -1239,18 +1252,102 @@ err: return; } +/*
- Prepare RPC request to free shared buffer in the same way, as
 
- OP-TEE does this.
 
- Return values:
 
- true - successfully prepared RPC request
 
- false - there was an error
 - */
 +static bool issue_rpc_cmd_free(struct optee_domain *ctx,
struct cpu_user_regs *regs,struct optee_std_call *call,struct shm_rpc *shm_rpc,uint64_t cookie)+{
- register_t r1, r2;
 - /* In case if guest will forget to update it with meaningful value */
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_GENERIC;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->cmd = OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->num_params = 1;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.a = call->rpc_buffer_type;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.b = cookie;
 - if ( access_guest_memory_by_ipa(current->domain,
 gfn_to_gaddr(shm_rpc->gfn),shm_rpc->xen_arg,OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(1),true) )- {
 /** Well, this is quite bad. We have error in error path.* This can happen only if guest behaves badly, so all* we can do is to return error to OP-TEE and leave* guest's memory leaked.
Could you expand a bit more what you mean by "guest's memory leaked"? What the state of the page from Xen PoV? I.e. is there any reference taken by the OP-TEE mediator? Will the page be freed once the guest is destroyed?...
*/shm_rpc->xen_arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_GENERIC;shm_rpc->xen_arg->num_params = 0;return false;- }
 - uint64_to_regpair(&r1, &r2, shm_rpc->cookie);
 - call->state = OPTEEM_CALL_XEN_RPC;
 - call->rpc_op = OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_CMD;
 - call->rpc_params[0] = r1;
 - call->rpc_params[1] = r2;
 - call->optee_thread_id = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
 - set_user_reg(regs, 0, OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_RPC_CMD);
 - set_user_reg(regs, 1, r1);
 - set_user_reg(regs, 2, r2);
 - return true;
 +}
+/* Handles return from Xen-issued RPC */ +static void handle_xen_rpc_return(struct optee_domain *ctx,
struct cpu_user_regs *regs,struct optee_std_call *call,struct shm_rpc *shm_rpc)+{
- call->state = OPTEEM_CALL_NORMAL;
 - /*
 * Right now we have only one reason to be there - we asked guest* to free shared buffer and it did it. Now we can tell OP-TEE that* buffer allocation failed.*/
Should we add an ASSERT to ensure the command is the one we expect?
- /*
 * We are not checking return value from a guest because we assume* that OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE newer fails.
s/newer/never/
*/- shm_rpc->xen_arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_GENERIC;
 - shm_rpc->xen_arg->num_params = 0;
 +}
- /*
 
- This function is called when guest is finished processing RPC
 - request from OP-TEE and wished to resume the interrupted standard
 - call.
 
- Return values:
 
- false - there was an error, do not call OP-TEE
 */
- true - success, proceed as normal
 -static void handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(struct optee_domain *ctx, +static bool handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(struct optee_domain *ctx, struct cpu_user_regs *regs, struct optee_std_call *call, struct shm_rpc *shm_rpc) { if ( shm_rpc->xen_arg->ret || shm_rpc->xen_arg->num_params != 1 )
return;
return true;if ( shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].attr != (OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_TMEM_OUTPUT | OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_NONCONTIG) ) @@ -1258,7 +1355,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(struct optee_domain *ctx, gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Invalid attrs for shared mem buffer: %"PRIx64"\n", shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].attr);
return;
return true; }/* Free pg list for buffer */ @@ -1274,21 +1371,14 @@ static void handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(struct optee_domain *ctx, { call->rpc_data_cookie = 0; /*
* Okay, so there was problem with guest's buffer and we need* to tell about this to OP-TEE.*/shm_rpc->xen_arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_GENERIC;shm_rpc->xen_arg->num_params = 0;/** TODO: With current implementation, OP-TEE will not issue* RPC to free this buffer. Guest and OP-TEE will be out of* sync: guest believes that it provided buffer to OP-TEE,* while OP-TEE thinks of opposite. Ideally, we need to* emulate RPC with OPTEE_MSG_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE command.
* We are unable to translate guest's buffer, so we need tell guest* to free it, before returning error to OP-TEE.
Do you mean "reporting" instead of "returning"? Also s/error/an error/
*/
gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,"translate_noncontig() failed, OP-TEE/guest state is out of sync.\n");
return !issue_rpc_cmd_free(ctx, regs, call, shm_rpc,shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.tmem.shm_ref); }- return true; }
 static void handle_rpc_cmd(struct optee_domain *ctx, struct cpu_user_regs *regs, @@ -1338,22 +1428,37 @@ static void handle_rpc_cmd(struct optee_domain *ctx, struct cpu_user_regs *regs, goto out; }
- switch (shm_rpc->xen_arg->cmd)
 
- if ( call->state == OPTEEM_CALL_NORMAL ) {
 
- case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_GET_TIME:
 - case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_WAIT_QUEUE:
 - case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SUSPEND:
 break;- case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
 handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(ctx, regs, call, shm_rpc);break;- case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:
 free_optee_shm_buf(ctx, shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.b);if ( call->rpc_data_cookie == shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.b )call->rpc_data_cookie = 0;break;- default:
 break;
switch (shm_rpc->xen_arg->cmd){case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_GET_TIME:case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_WAIT_QUEUE:case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SUSPEND:break;case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:if ( !handle_rpc_cmd_alloc(ctx, regs, call, shm_rpc) ){/* We failed to translate buffer, report back to guest */unmap_domain_page(shm_rpc->xen_arg);put_std_call(ctx, call);return;}break;case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_FREE:free_optee_shm_buf(ctx, shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.b);if ( call->rpc_data_cookie ==shm_rpc->xen_arg->params[0].u.value.b )call->rpc_data_cookie = 0;break;default:break;}- }
 - else
 - {
 handle_xen_rpc_return(ctx, regs, call, shm_rpc); }out:
Cheers,