On 31 January 2012 12:02, Alexander Sack asac@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Tony Mansson tony.mansson@linaro.org wrote:
The full names are kind of cumbersome to use in everyday speech so I
predict
nicknames :)
Very good point. Do we want to set up nicknames proactively or just see what happens?
I suggest we call the snowball build Yeti since that was my suggestion for the name of the board, but the jury selected snowball. :)
I think most of us will ignore ics, and gcc in the name and just call it the upstream- or stable-snowball and so on.
And +1 on Jons comment about the order.
Do we really need all pf the builds? I think not only the names, but the number of builds have caused some confusion. Didn't we have an idea that we would try to reduce the number of manifests?
/Patrik
-- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro Platform Teams http://www.linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs http://twitter.com/#%21/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
linaro-android mailing list linaro-android@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android