Since we're all in on our igloo/Linaro co-developed method we'd like to stop working on staging-snowball (Linaro kernel) and focus our efforts on landing-snowball (igloo kernel). Does anyone have any objections?
There hasn't been any work/support done o staging-snowball since the middle of December. The output from staging-snowball should be ignored.
On the flip side I wouldn't delete it. It it is very useful to have SW GL build and an accelerated build.
Mathieu.
On 12-01-24 09:05 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Since we're all in on our igloo/Linaro co-developed method we'd like to stop working on staging-snowball (Linaro kernel) and focus our efforts on landing-snowball (igloo kernel). Does anyone have any objections?
Hello Zach:
On 24 January 2012 11:05, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfeffer@linaro.org wrote:
Since we're all in on our igloo/Linaro co-developed method we'd like to stop working on staging-snowball (Linaro kernel) and focus our efforts on landing-snowball (igloo kernel). Does anyone have any objections?
From my perspective, that is a great idea. However, I would like us to
pick less cryptic names. People can't easily associate the Landing-snowball build with the igloo kernel. Can we adopt a simpler naming scheme such as official and community. I know we need to make this change across other landing teams as well but it is worth the pain.
anmar
On 24 January 2012 11:39, anmar.oueja@linaro.org anmar.oueja@linaro.orgwrote:
Hello Zach:
On 24 January 2012 11:05, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfeffer@linaro.org wrote:
Since we're all in on our igloo/Linaro co-developed method we'd like to
stop
working on staging-snowball (Linaro kernel) and focus our efforts on landing-snowball (igloo kernel). Does anyone have any objections?
From my perspective, that is a great idea. However, I would like us to pick less cryptic names. People can't easily associate the Landing-snowball build with the igloo kernel. Can we adopt a simpler naming scheme such as official and community. I know we need to make this change across other landing teams as well but it is worth the pain.
Anmar,
You are right. We do need to fix the names. How would a tuple work:
<kernel src>-<gcc version>-<AOSP version>-<target>
So staging-snowball would be:
linaro-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball
and landing-snowball would be
igloo-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball
What do you think?
anmar
On 24 January 2012 13:02, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfeffer@linaro.org wrote:
-- snip --
<kernel src>-<gcc version>-<AOSP version>-<target>
So staging-snowball would be:
linaro-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball
and landing-snowball would be
igloo-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball
What do you think?
so if we use the igloo 3.2 branch it will be igloo3.2-gcc4.6-aosp4.0.3-snowball and for using the tracking kernel we use iglootracking-gcc4.6-aosp-4.0.3-snowball?
anmar
linaro-android@lists.linaro.org
-
anmar.oueja＠linaro.org -
Mathieu Poirier -
Zach Pfeffer