Sightlineapplications April 2023

sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org

4 participants
2 discussions

by Paul Neuhardt

All, Dmitry has now delivered what he believes to be the final set of updates to Sightline in support of this project. Sightline is in the process of testing these deliverables and we expect that the results will be at or close to what was expected. If there are still gaps, we will of course work to close them. As of today, there are still 13.5 hours of Dmitry's time left available under the most recent contract extension. This should provide adequate time for any consultation needed and any updates and/or final tuning necessary. I have attached a brief report on that burn to this email. Steve, I will send you a more detailed version that you can share inside Sightline as needed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. While I will continue to be in touch as we close down the project, I want to take this opportunity to thank everyone involved for all their work. I am confident I speak for all of us at Linaro when I say I hope we have the opportunity to work with Sightline Applications again in the future. Kind regards, Paul -- [image: Linaro] <http://www.linaro.org/> Paul Neuhardt | *Sr. Program Manager* T: +44 0771 377 8664 paul.neuhardt(a)linaro.org <glen.valante(a)linaro.org> IRC: pneuhardt

11 months

Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing

by Dmitry Baryshkov

Hi Rhonda, On 13/04/2023 02:01, Rhonda Cohen wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > Are you in contact with FedEx? I see that they have tried to deliver > once, and then it was rerouted without success. Can you provide the > address and telephone number you gave to FedEx? Perhaps, I can help > close this. Thank you. I have been pinging FedEx for the last several business days. Today the locker company delivery timed out, so FedEx asked again how I'd like to receive the parcel. I asked for delivery to the home address again: Piispanristi 2 A 86 02200 Espoo My phone is +358469526397 However I do not think that additional intervention is required. Adding additional information can mess things for them. It happened once already: Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:35): okay, as I see package was sent to lockerbox at 2nd of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:46): to be honest it should be already in lockerbox at 5th of April Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:58): you didn't recieved any sms with location and code? Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:11): No Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:57): And the tracking page visible to me shows: Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:58): Friday, 31/03/2023 Delay Rerouted to revised delivery address Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:23): but rerouted wasn't possible due of wrong phone number Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:33): correct phone number was provided for us at 02.04 Me (06/04/2023, 15:07:39): Hmm. How is that possible? I had a missed call and an SMS from FedEx on Friday, 31.03 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:07:44): I think sender made mistake, so they send us correct phone number at the beginning of this week Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:18): becouse simply it depends on what sender procided, in fedex system are two tabs for number, one at package, second one is for notifications Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:29): I think sender just provided two different numbers Me (06/04/2023, 15:08:37): +358 469526397 Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:44): that was phone number provided firstly "5037249727" Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:04): Yes. That is my phone and I was contacted on this phone on Friday. As you can see, the original phone was correct, then somebody (Lantronix?) sent them another phone ("for notifications"), which FedEx/lockers could not use to send me the additional info. > > Detailed Tracking (fedex.com) > <https://www.fedex.com/fedextrack/?trknbr=521665246367&trkqual=2460019000~52…> > > Since the shipment has already passed customs, I am assuming that you no > longer need the commercial invoice. It is attached in case you do. I think I wrote in one of emails that Commercial invoice is required by law. Customs can ask for one for the next 6 months. > > Best regards, > > ** > > *Rhonda Cohen* > > she/her > > ** > > +1 541-517-2768 mobile > > rhonda.cohen(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com> > > www.sightlineapplications.com <http://www.sightlineapplications.com/> > > <http://sightlineapplications.com/> > > *From:* Jordan Holt <jordan.holt(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>> > *Sent:* Friday, April 7, 2023 9:43 AM > *To:* Rhonda Cohen <rhonda.cohen(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:rhonda.cohen@sightlineapplications.com>>; Steve Olson > <steve.olson(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com>> > *Subject:* Fwd: [Sightlineapplications] Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing > > Forwarding to Rhonda > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org > <mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>> > *Sent:* Friday, April 7, 2023 6:02:33 AM > *To:* Steve Olson <steve.olson(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:steve.olson@sightlineapplications.com>> > *Cc:* Kim Steiner <kim.steiner(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>>; Jordan Holt > <jordan.holt(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>>; Paul Neuhardt > <paul.neuhardt(a)linaro.org <mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>>; > sightlineapplications(a)lists.linaro.org > <mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org><sightlineapplications(a)lists.linaro.org <mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org>> > *Subject:* Re: [Sightlineapplications] Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing > > Hi Steve, > > On 07/04/2023 04:49, Steve Olson wrote: > > Dmitry, did you get the board from lantronix yet? > > No, I did not receive it yet. > Here is a transcript with the chat with support person: > > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:35): okay, as I see package was sent to > lockerbox at 2nd of April > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:46): to be honest it should be already in > lockerbox at 5th of April > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:04:58): you didn't recieved any sms with > location and code? > Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:11): No > Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:57): And the tracking page visible to me shows: > Me (06/04/2023, 15:05:58): Friday, 31/03/2023 Delay Rerouted to > revised delivery address > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:23): but rerouted wasn't possible due of > wrong phone number > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:06:33): correct phone number was provided > for us at 02.04 > Me (06/04/2023, 15:07:39): Hmm. How is that possible? I had a missed > call and an SMS from FedEx on Friday, 31.03 > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:07:44): I think sender made mistake, so they > send us correct phone number at the beginning of this week > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:18): becouse simply it depends on what > sender procided, in fedex system are two tabs for number, one at > package, second one is for notifications > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:29): I think sender just provided two > different numbers > Me (06/04/2023, 15:08:37): +358 469526397 > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:08:44): that was phone number provided > firstly "5037249727" > Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:04): Yes. That is my phone and I was contacted on > this phone on Friday. > Me (06/04/2023, 15:09:32): ok. Anyway, how can we resolve this situation? > Krzysztof H (06/04/2023, 15:10:51): well, I will ask our colleagues from > support team to reach lockerbox company and to push your package. I will > also tell them to send notification about location at this number +358 > 469526397, okay? > Me (06/04/2023, 15:11:05): Yes, this is fine. Thank you > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > >> On Apr 6, 2023, at 11:54 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov > <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org <mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>> wrote: > >> > >> On 06/04/2023 21:51, Kim Steiner wrote: > >>> Hi Dmitry, > >>> This is the parameter file from the board that is having issues. > You can copy it to the /home/slroot/sl/bin folder on your 4000. It is a > single cam0 configured as a testpattern 1080p image. > >> > >> Ack, thanks > >> > >>> Can you try the link again? I changed permissions. > >> > >> Yes, it works now. > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Kim > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org > <mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>> > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 11:31 AM > >>> To: Kim Steiner <kim.steiner(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>> > >>> Cc: Jordan Holt <jordan.holt(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>>; Paul Neuhardt > <paul.neuhardt(a)linaro.org <mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>>; > sightlineapplications(a)lists.linaro.org > <mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org> > >>> Subject: Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing > >>>> On 06/04/2023 20:56, Kim Steiner wrote: > >>>> Hi Dmitry, > >>>> > >>>> With the latest patch for 5.15, both boards that didn't boot up > now boot, but one of the two boards crashes when we run our software. > Attached is the dmesg log. > >>> This is interesting. I also noticed the following: > >>> [ 44.186437] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to add VFE#0 to > power domain > >>> [ 44.186515] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to power up > pipeline: -22 > >>> [ 44.189179] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to add VFE#0 to > power domain > >>> [ 44.199654] qcom-camss a34000.camss: Failed to power up > pipeline: -22 > >>> So, some parts of the board might be underpowered. > >>> I will take a look, what can be causing this issue or how can we > cope with that. In the mean time, could you please describe, which > camera is enabled on this board? > >>>> With the latest patch for 5.15, we observe that the CPU functions > (Analyze) is a little slower. We also observe that power usage has > increased between 4.14 and 5.15: > >>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UD6FofrJKZ_9W7rGWTkN-DyoVI9KXQxktE > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UD6FofrJKZ_9W7rGWTkN-DyoVI9KXQxktE> > >>>> XY6eYpeUU/edit#bookmark=id.y65dtcn7w11x > >>> I don't have access to this document. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Kim > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov(a)linaro.org > <mailto:dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>> > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 10:57 AM > >>>> To: Kim Steiner <kim.steiner(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:kim.steiner@sightlineapplications.com>> > >>>> Cc: Jordan Holt <jordan.holt(a)sightlineapplications.com > <mailto:jordan.holt@sightlineapplications.com>>; Paul Neuhardt > >>>> <paul.neuhardt(a)linaro.org <mailto:paul.neuhardt@linaro.org>>; > sightlineapplications(a)lists.linaro.org > <mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: Low temperature GPU hang testing > >>>> > >>>> Hi Kim, > >>>> > >>>> On 05/04/2023 17:08, Kim Steiner wrote: > >>>>> Hi Dmitry, > >>>>> > >>>>> This was two weeks ago when I ran this, but I do not think so. > >>>>> Although we didn’t do any temp test in our freezer (room temp only), > >>>>> because we didn’t hear back from you on if this was correct. > Should we? > >>>>> > >>>>> I think you should create a single patch for us to test because the > >>>>> last patch you sent us did not compile, so I’m wondering if the > >>>>> correct patch was sent to us. In that patch, this line didn’t > compile: dev_info(gpu: > >>>>> "GPU setting to %ld\n", *freq); > >>>> > >>>> Please give a series of tests to the attached patch. > >>>> I'm interested in: > >>>> - speed bins for the boards that crashed when you tested the > previous version, check the following line in the dmesg: > >>>> [ 4.105174] adreno b00000.gpu: Detected speed bin 0 > >>>> > >>>> - checking that GPU performance matches the expectations. > >>>> > >>>> - checking that the boards are stable in normal conditions and in > the fridge test. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your testing! > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> With best wishes > >>>> Dmitry > >>> -- > >>> With best wishes > >>> Dmitry > >> > >> -- > >> With best wishes > >> Dmitry > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sightlineapplications mailing list -- > sightlineapplications(a)lists.linaro.org > <mailto:sightlineapplications@lists.linaro.org> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to > sightlineapplications-leave(a)lists.linaro.org > <mailto:sightlineapplications-leave@lists.linaro.org> > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry > -- With best wishes Dmitry

1 year

2024

2023

2022

Sightlineapplications April 2023