On 6/17/20 3:58 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
Hi Maxim,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 23:28, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uvarov@linaro.org wrote:
With the evolving use-cases for TEE bus, now it's required to support multi-stage enumeration process. But using a simple index doesn't suffice this requirement and instead leads to duplicate sysfs entries. So instead switch to use more informative device UUID for sysfs entry like: /sys/bus/tee/devices/optee-ta-<uuid>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uvarov@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices | 8 ++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 9 ++++++--- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0ae04ae5374a --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +What: /sys/bus/tee/devices/optee-ta-<uuid>/ +Date: May 2020 +KernelVersion 5.7 +Contact: tee-dev@lists.linaro.org +Description:
OP-TEE bus provides reference to registered drivers under this directory. The <uuid>
matches Trusted Application (TA) driver and corresponding TA in secure OS. Drivers
are free to create needed API under optee-ta-<uuid> directory.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index ecc0749810b0..6717afef2de3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -12516,6 +12516,7 @@ OP-TEE DRIVER M: Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org L: tee-dev@lists.linaro.org S: Maintained +F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices F: drivers/tee/optee/
OP-TEE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR (RNG) DRIVER diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c index e3a148521ec1..23d264c8146e 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/device.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/device.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int get_devices(struct tee_context *ctx, u32 session, return 0; }
-static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid, u32 device_id) +static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid) { struct tee_client_device *optee_device = NULL; int rc; @@ -75,7 +75,10 @@ static int optee_register_device(const uuid_t *device_uuid, u32 device_id) return -ENOMEM;
optee_device->dev.bus = &tee_bus_type;
dev_set_name(&optee_device->dev, "optee-clnt%u", device_id);
if (dev_set_name(&optee_device->dev, "optee-ta-%pUl", device_uuid)) {
You should be using format specifier as: "%pUb" instead of "%pUl" as UUID representation for TAs is in big endian format. See below:
Where does device_uuid come from? If it comes directly from OP-TEE, then it should be a pointer to the following struct:
typedef struct { uint32_t timeLow; uint16_t timeMid; uint16_t timeHiAndVersion; uint8_t clockSeqAndNode[8]; } TEE_UUID;
(GlobalPlatform TEE Internal Core API spec v1.2.1 section 3.2.4)
- The spec does not mandate any particular endianness and simply warns about possible issues if secure and non-secure worlds differ in endianness. - OP-TEE uses %pUl assuming that host order is little endian (that is true for the Arm platforms that run OP-TEE currently). By the same logic %pUl should be fine in the kernel. - On the other hand, the UUID in a Trusted App header is always encoded big endian by the Python script that signs and optionally encrypts the TA. This should not have any visible impact on UUIDs exchanged between the secure and non-secure world though.
So I am wondering why you had to use %pUb. There must be some inconsistency somewhere :-/