Dear Managing Director,
Hello from Future Valve Group.
Wafer Type Butterfly Valve, PN10/16/150LB,Steel Handle Operation
Body/Disc/Stem/Seat=DI/DI/STST/EPDM or NBR
Size KG USD/PC
DN50 2.3 5.88
DN65 2.7 6.40
DN80 3.2 7.78
DN100 4.4 10.71
DN125 6.8 14.51
DN150 7.3 17.80
DN200 12.5 31.10
DN250 17.5 46.64
DN300 27 67.37
If you are interested in our products,pls contact with us.
I'll send you more information with drawing and photos.
Thank you & best regards!
Alvin G.
Valve Solution Expert
Tianjin Future Valve Co.,Ltd
Mob/Whatsapp/Wechat. +86-15233601620
Skype. live:alvin.guo
alvin(a)future-valve.com
www.linkedin.com/in/chinavalve
Add. Huangtai Development Area, Xiaozhan,Jinnan District, Tianjin, Chin
a
(If you are not the correct person,could you help reforward this mail t
o purchase department?Thank you!)
Top quality! Competitive price!
0000-00-00 3140 2020-10-28
.
Hi All
The patches to add support for Asymmetric AArch32 systems are now being
discussed upstream on LAKML and Linux-Arch mailing lists.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/20201008181641.32767-1-qais.yousef@arm.c…
If you're interested in the patches, please do join the discussion to help
shape them.
For android-5.4 support, an updated patch is available now in linux-power.git
that fixes a sleep-in-atomic bug. Please update your patch to the newer
version.
git clone https://git.gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-power.git -b asym-aarch32-5.4-v2
Note that linux-power.git is now hosted on gitlab.arm.com.
Thanks
--
Qais Yousef
Hi,
I just wanted to check if you would be interested in acquiring a contact
list of Managed Service providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service
Providers (MSSPs) for your Marketing and Demand Generation program.
*You might also be interested in other categories like*:
· CSPs, ISPs, ISVs, VARS, SIs
· Cyber Security Customers of Top Companies
· Storage customers of Top Companies
· Virtualization customers of Top Companies
· Networking customers of Top Companies
· Contact Center customers of Top Companies
· CRM, ERP and HCM customers of Top Companies
· Microsoft, Salesforce, AWS, Oracle, SAP, Cisco, IBM etc. Customers
*Each contact comes with* Company name, Website, Contact name (First,
Middle, Last), Title, Direct email address, Phone, Postal address,
Industry, SIC codes, Employee size, Revenue size.
Please let me know if this is something of interest to you so that I can
provide you with further information.
Warm regards,
Raechel Lambert| Go-To-Market Coordinator
If you wish to not to receive further emails, change the subject line to
Unsubscribe
In find_energy_effecient_cpu(), if we set a task min util clamp to 1024,
all cpus will be skipped because of !fit_capcity() condition.
And the return value will always be prev_cpu (best_energy_cpu initial value).
For this case is it better to find max spare capcity CPU in the whole system?
ex.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index da3e5b54715b..7e431195753e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6536,6 +6536,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct
task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX;
struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd;
unsigned long cpu_cap, util, base_energy = 0;
+ unsigned long sys_max_spare_cap = 0;
+ int sys_max_spare_cap_cpu = prev_cpu;
int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu;
struct sched_domain *sd;
struct perf_domain *pd;
@@ -6576,6 +6578,14 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct
task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
spare_cap = cpu_cap - util;
+ /*
+ * Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity in
+ * the performance domain
+ */
+ if (spare_cap > sys_max_spare_cap) {
+ sys_max_spare_cap = spare_cap;
+ sys_max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu;
+ }
/*
* Skip CPUs that cannot satisfy the capacity request.
* IOW, placing the task there would make the CPU
@@ -6622,7 +6632,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct
task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
* least 6% of the energy used by prev_cpu.
*/
if (prev_delta == ULONG_MAX)
- return best_energy_cpu;
+ return sys_max_spare_cap_cpu;
if ((prev_delta - best_delta) > ((prev_delta + base_energy) >> 4))
return best_energy_cpu;
Best Regards,
Yun