eas-dev

eas-dev@lists.linaro.org

310 discussions

[Integration Branch] Update 27-Nov-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

Hi, A new EAS integration branch eas/next/integration is available under https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-power/-/commits/eas/next/integration For further information about main features, test coverage and work items for next integration have a look at: https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/linux-ker… Best Regards, -- Dietmar

5 years, 9 months

[Integration Branch] Update 30-Oct-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

5 years, 11 months

[Integration Branch] Update 25-Sept-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

6 years

Support for Asymmetric AArch32

by Qais Yousef

Hi All The patches to add support for Asymmetric AArch32 systems are now being discussed upstream on LAKML and Linux-Arch mailing lists. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/20201008181641.32767-1-qais.yousef@arm.c… If you're interested in the patches, please do join the discussion to help shape them. For android-5.4 support, an updated patch is available now in linux-power.git that fixes a sleep-in-atomic bug. Please update your patch to the newer version. git clone https://git.gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-power.git -b asym-aarch32-5.4-v2 Note that linux-power.git is now hosted on gitlab.arm.com. Thanks -- Qais Yousef

6 years

[Integration Branch] Update 28-Aug-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

Hi, A new EAS integration branch eas/next/integration is available on http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-power.git For further information about main features, test coverage and work items for next integration have a look at: https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/linux-ker… Best Regards, -- Dietmar

6 years

Question about find_energy_effecient_cpu always return prev_cpu if task set uclamp min to 1024

by 向澐

In find_energy_effecient_cpu(), if we set a task min util clamp to 1024, all cpus will be skipped because of !fit_capcity() condition. And the return value will always be prev_cpu (best_energy_cpu initial value). For this case is it better to find max spare capcity CPU in the whole system? ex. diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index da3e5b54715b..7e431195753e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -6536,6 +6536,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX; struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd; unsigned long cpu_cap, util, base_energy = 0; + unsigned long sys_max_spare_cap = 0; + int sys_max_spare_cap_cpu = prev_cpu; int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu; struct sched_domain *sd; struct perf_domain *pd; @@ -6576,6 +6578,14 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu); spare_cap = cpu_cap - util; + /* + * Find the CPU with the maximum spare capacity in + * the performance domain + */ + if (spare_cap > sys_max_spare_cap) { + sys_max_spare_cap = spare_cap; + sys_max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu; + } /* * Skip CPUs that cannot satisfy the capacity request. * IOW, placing the task there would make the CPU @@ -6622,7 +6632,7 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) * least 6% of the energy used by prev_cpu. */ if (prev_delta == ULONG_MAX) - return best_energy_cpu; + return sys_max_spare_cap_cpu; if ((prev_delta - best_delta) > ((prev_delta + base_energy) >> 4)) return best_energy_cpu; Best Regards, Yun

6 years, 1 month

[Integration Branch] Update 24-July-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

6 years, 2 months

[Integration Branch] Update 25-June-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

6 years, 3 months

[Integration Branch] Update 25-May-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

6 years, 4 months

[Integration Branch] Update 27-Apr-2020

by Dietmar Eggemann

6 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

eas-dev