Hi Bjorn,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas helgaas@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:11:55PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
On 09.03.2016 10:13, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Thanks for your pointers! See my comments inline. Aslo, can you please have a look at my previous patch set v4 and check how many of your comments are already addressed there. We may want to back to it then.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/4/646 Especially patches [0-6] which handle MMCONFIG refactoring.
On 05.03.2016 05:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
As you pointed out raw_pci_{read|write} make things complicated, so IMO we should either say they are absolutely necessary (and then think how to simplify it) or just use simple bus-specific accessor (patch 02/15) e.g. for ARM64.
Any comments appreciated.
Kindly reminder. I would like to move on with this patch set. Can you please comments on it so that we could decide which way to go.
Can you repost your current proposal with a version number higher than any previous ones? It's OK if the content is the same as v4; I just think it's confusing if we resurrect v4 and have to follow discussion from v3 to v4 to v5 and back to v4. The archives would be a bit of a muddle.
I had posted a patchset based on your suggestions in this thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/17/621
Would appreciate any comments on that. Like I said in the earlier mail, if this is a reasonable approach, I can combine this with Tomasz patchset to provide the full patchset for ACPI support.
Thanks, JC.