Hi Guenter,
np, will do so :-)
On 19 May 2015 at 01:23, Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:19:22AM +0800, Fu Wei wrote:
Hi Arnd,
Great thanks for your suggestion :-)
feedback inline below
On 15 May 2015 at 22:04, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Friday 15 May 2015 19:24:48 fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
+static void watchdog_check_min_max_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd) +{
/*
* Check that we have valid min and max pretimeout values, if
* not reset them both to 0 (=not used or unknown)
*/
if (wdd->min_pretimeout > wdd->max_pretimeout) {
pr_info("Invalid min and max pretimeout, resetting to 0!\n");
wdd->min_pretimeout = 0;
wdd->max_pretimeout = 0;
}
+}
I would probably just fold this function into the existing watchdog_check_min_max_timeout() and check both normal and pre-timeout there.
yes, I can do that , and that is good idea
+/**
- watchdog_init_pretimeout() - initialize the pretimeout field
- @pretimeout_parm: pretimeout module parameter
- @dev: Device that stores the timeout-sec property
- Initialize the pretimeout field of the watchdog_device struct with either
- the pretimeout module parameter (if it is valid value) or the timeout-sec
- property (only if it is a valid value and the timeout_parm is out of bounds).
- If none of them are valid then we keep the old value (which should normally
- be the default pretimeout value.
- A zero is returned on success and -EINVAL for failure.
- */
+int watchdog_init_pretimeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
unsigned int pretimeout_parm, struct device *dev)
+{
int ret = 0;
u32 timeouts[2];
watchdog_check_min_max_pretimeout(wdd);
/* try to get the timeout module parameter first */
if (!watchdog_pretimeout_invalid(wdd, pretimeout_parm) &&
pretimeout_parm) {
wdd->pretimeout = pretimeout_parm;
return ret;
}
if (pretimeout_parm)
ret = -EINVAL;
/* try to get the timeout_sec property */
if (!dev || !dev->of_node)
return ret;
ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node,
"timeout-sec", timeouts, 2);
if (!watchdog_pretimeout_invalid(wdd, timeouts[1]) && timeouts[1])
wdd->pretimeout = timeouts[1];
else
ret = -EINVAL;
return ret;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(watchdog_init_pretimeout);
Same here: the function is very similar to the watchdog_init_timeout function, and it reads the same property, so just do both here.
The easiest way for that is probably to use of_find_property() and of_prop_next_u32() to read the two numbers.
integrate watchdog_init_pretimeout and watchdog_init_timeout will be a little hard, we may need to change this API to :
watchdog_init_timeouts(struct watchdog_device *wdd, unsigned int timeout_parm, unsigned int pretimeout_parm, struct device *dev)
then we need to update all the watchdog drivers which use this API, maybe we can do this in a individual patchset, after this pretimeout patch is merged.
Is that OK ? :-) any thought?
That is what I would recommend.
Guenter